mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Honey, I Shrunk The Actor: A Case Study on Preserving Performance with Smaller Actors in Actor-Critic RL

arXiv 2102.11893 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.ROcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Actors and critics in actor-critic reinforcement learning algorithms are functionally separate, yet they often use the same network architectures. This case study explores the performance impact of network sizes when considering actor and critic architectures independently. By relaxing the assumption of architectural symmetry, it is often possible for smaller actors to achieve comparable policy performance to their symmetric counterparts. Our experiments show up to 99% reduction in the number of network weights with an average reduction of 77% over multiple actor-critic algorithms on 9 independent tasks. Given that reducing actor complexity results in a direct reduction of run-time inference cost, we believe configurations of actors and critics are aspects of actor-critic design that deserve to be considered independently, particularly in resource-constrained applications or when deploying multiple actors simultaneously.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2021.

Builds on

25 of 39 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  4. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  5. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  6. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  7. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
  8. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  9. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  10. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
  11. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 727
  12. 2015Policy Distillationcited by 414
13 more
  1. 2016Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Controlcited by 361
  2. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
  3. 2018Unity: A General Platform for Intelligent Agentscited by 232
  4. 2017Asymmetric Actor Critic for Image-Based Robot Learningcited by 202
  5. 2018A Study on Overfitting in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 170
  6. 2017Soft Weight-Sharing for Neural Network Compressioncited by 99
  7. 2017Reproducibility of Benchmarked Deep Reinforcement Learning Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 92
  8. 2018A Dissection of Overfitting and Generalization in Continuous Reinforcement Learningcited by 86
  9. 2020D2RL: Deep Dense Architectures in Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  10. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Navigation in AAA Video Gamescited by 27
  11. 2019Automated Video Game Testing Using Synthetic and Human-Like Agentscited by 22
  12. 2019Winning Isn't Everything: Enhancing Game Development with Intelligent Agentscited by 15
  13. 2019On Multi-Agent Learning in Team Sports Gamescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.