Parameterized Projected Bellman Operator
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Approximate value iteration (AVI) is a family of algorithms for reinforcement learning (RL) that aims to obtain an approximation of the optimal value function. Generally, AVI algorithms implement an iterated procedure where each step consists of (i) an application of the Bellman operator and (ii) a projection step into a considered function space. Notoriously, the Bellman operator leverages transition samples, which strongly determine its behavior, as uninformative samples can result in negligible updates or long detours, whose detrimental effects are further exacerbated by the computationally intensive projection step. To address these issues, we propose a novel alternative approach based on learning an approximate version of the Bellman operator rather than estimating it through samples as in AVI approaches. This way, we are able to (i) generalize across transition samples and (ii) avoid the computationally intensive projection step. For this reason, we call our novel operator projected Bellman operator (PBO). We formulate an optimization problem to learn PBO for generic sequential decision-making problems, and we theoretically analyze its properties in two representative classes of RL problems. Furthermore, we theoretically study our approach under the lens of AVI and devise algorithmic implementations to learn PBO in offline and online settings by leveraging neural network parameterizations. Finally, we empirically showcase the benefits of PBO w.r.t. the regular Bellman operator on several RL problems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2023.
Builds on
20 of 45 references.
References · 20
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
- 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,027
- 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 765
- 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 669
- 2021Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spacescited by 414
- 2019A Theory of Regularized Markov Decision Processescited by 286
- 2020FLAMBE: Structural Complexity and Representation Learning of Low Rank MDPscited by 233
- 2017A unified view of entropy-regularized Markov decision processescited by 182
- 2016Value Iteration Networkscited by 160
- 2023A Brief Review of Hypernetworks in Deep Learningcited by 102
8 more
- 2022Learning Operators with Coupled Attentioncited by 90
- 2015Increasing the Action Gap: New Operators for Reinforcement Learningcited by 49
- 2021Recomposing the Reinforcement Learning Building Blocks with Hypernetworkscited by 35
- 2020Logistic Q-Learningcited by 34
- 2021Bayesian Bellman Operatorscited by 16
- 2019Entropic Regularization of Markov Decision Processescited by 15
- 2021Agnostic Reinforcement Learning with Low-Rank MDPs and Rich Observationscited by 13
- 2020Robust Reinforcement Learning: A Case Study in Linear Quadratic Regulationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.