mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Point-to-Region Loss for Semi-Supervised Point-Based Crowd Counting

arXiv 2505.21943 ↗First posted 28 May 2025cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Point detection has been developed to locate pedestrians in crowded scenes by training a counter through a point-to-point (P2P) supervision scheme. Despite its excellent localization and counting performance, training a point-based counter still faces challenges concerning annotation labor: hundreds to thousands of points are required to annotate a single sample capturing a dense crowd. In this paper, we integrate point-based methods into a semi-supervised counting framework based on pseudo-labeling, enabling the training of a counter with only a few annotated samples supplemented by a large volume of pseudo-labeled data. However, during implementation, the training encounters issues as the confidence for pseudo-labels fails to be propagated to background pixels via the P2P. To tackle this challenge, we devise a point-specific activation map (PSAM) to visually interpret the phenomena occurring during the ill-posed training. Observations from the PSAM suggest that the feature map is excessively activated by the loss for unlabeled data, causing the decoder to misinterpret these over-activations as pedestrians. To mitigate this issue, we propose a point-to-region (P2R) scheme to substitute P2P, which segments out local regions rather than detects a point corresponding to a pedestrian for supervision. Consequently, pixels in the local region can share the same confidence with the corresponding pseudo points. Experimental results in both semi-supervised counting and unsupervised domain adaptation highlight the advantages of our method, illustrating P2R can resolve issues identified in PSAM. The code is available at https://github.com/Elin24/P2RLoss.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

Builds on

45 of 78 references.

References · 45

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  4. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  5. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
  6. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 582
  7. 2018CSRNet: Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks for Understanding the Highly Congested Scenescited by 267
  8. 2018Composition Loss for Counting, Density Map Estimation and Localization in Dense Crowdscited by 186
  9. 2019Bayesian Loss for Crowd Count Estimation with Point Supervisioncited by 162
  10. 2021Rethinking Counting and Localization in Crowds:A Purely Point-Based Frameworkcited by 152
  11. 2020NWPU-Crowd: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Crowd Counting and Localizationcited by 151
  12. 2021Learning To Count Everythingcited by 150
33 more
  1. 2019Learning from Synthetic Data for Crowd Counting in the Wildcited by 148
  2. 2020Distribution Matching for Crowd Countingcited by 143
  3. 2020JHU-CROWD++: Large-Scale Crowd Counting Dataset and A Benchmark Methodcited by 109
  4. 2017Switching Convolutional Neural Network for Crowd Countingcited by 93
  5. 2023CLIP-Count: Towards Text-Guided Zero-Shot Object Countingcited by 83
  6. 2022An End-to-End Transformer Model for Crowd Localizationcited by 74
  7. 2022Boosting Crowd Counting via Multifaceted Attentioncited by 73
  8. 2020Localization in the Crowd with Topological Constraintscited by 68
  9. 2021Domain Generalization via Gradient Surgerycited by 60
  10. 2018Leveraging Unlabeled Data for Crowd Counting by Learning to Rankcited by 57
  11. 2023Zero-shot Object Countingcited by 57
  12. 2022Rethinking Spatial Invariance of Convolutional Networks for Object Countingcited by 54
  13. 2019Exploiting Unlabeled Data in CNNs by Self-supervised Learning to Rankcited by 52
  14. 2023STEERER: Resolving Scale Variations for Counting and Localization via Selective Inheritance Learningcited by 41
  15. 2023Point-Query Quadtree for Crowd Counting, Localization, and Morecited by 40
  16. 2021Spatial Uncertainty-Aware Semi-Supervised Crowd Countingcited by 38
  17. 2020Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting via Self-Training on Surrogate Taskscited by 35
  18. 2023Training-free Object Counting with Promptscited by 34
  19. 2019Explaining Convolutional Neural Networks using Softmax Gradient Layer-wise Relevance Propagationcited by 29
  20. 2022Cross-View Cross-Scene Multi-View Crowd Countingcited by 28
  21. 2020Learning to Count in the Crowd from Limited Labeled Datacited by 27
  22. 2020Learning Independent Instance Maps for Crowd Localizationcited by 24
  23. 2020Pixel-wise Crowd Understanding via Synthetic Datacited by 23
  24. 2023Calibrating Uncertainty for Semi-Supervised Crowd Countingcited by 22
  25. 2020Tracking-by-Counting: Using Network Flows on Crowd Density Maps for Tracking Multiple Targetscited by 18
  26. 2021Direct Measure Matching for Crowd Countingcited by 18
  27. 2022Semi-supervised Crowd Counting via Density Agencycited by 18
  28. 2024Single Domain Generalization for Crowd Countingcited by 17
  29. 2020Towards Unsupervised Crowd Counting via Regression-Detection Bi-knowledge Transfercited by 13
  30. 2023ODAM: Gradient-based instance-specific visual explanations for object detectioncited by 12
  31. 2024A Fixed-Point Approach to Unified Prompt-Based Countingcited by 10
  32. 2024Semi-supervised Counting via Pixel-by-pixel Density Distribution Modellingcited by 7
  33. 2024Robust Zero-Shot Crowd Counting and Localization With Adaptive Resolution SAMcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.