Human and AI Perceptual Differences in Image Classification Errors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial intelligence (AI) models for computer vision trained with supervised machine learning are assumed to solve classification tasks by imitating human behavior learned from training labels. Most efforts in recent vision research focus on measuring the model task performance using standardized benchmarks such as accuracy. However, limited work has sought to understand the perceptual difference between humans and machines. To fill this gap, this study first analyzes the statistical distributions of mistakes from the two sources and then explores how task difficulty level affects these distributions. We find that even when AI learns an excellent model from the training data, one that outperforms humans in overall accuracy, these AI models have significant and consistent differences from human perception. We demonstrate the importance of studying these differences with a simple human-AI teaming algorithm that outperforms humans alone, AI alone, or AI-AI teaming.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 1 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2023.
Builds on
1 of 1 references.
References · 1
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2023The Importance of Human-Labeled Data in the Era of LLMscited by 8
- 2024A Survey on Human-AI Collaboration with Large Foundation Modelscited by 7
- 2024Learning to Complement and to Defer to Multiple Userscited by 7
- 2024Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple Expertscited by 5
- 2025When VLMs Meet Image Classification: Test Sets Renovation via Missing Label Identificationcited by 5
- 2025No Need for Learning to Defer? A Training Free Deferral Framework to Multiple Experts through Conformal Predictioncited by 2
- 2024Human-AI Collaborative Multi-modal Multi-rater Learning for Endometriosis Diagnosiscited by 1
- 2026Directional Confusions Reveal Divergent Inductive Biases Through Rate-Distortion Geometry in Human and Machine Visioncited by 0
- 2026V-REX: Efficient Specialist VLM Training for Veterinary X-Rayscited by 0
- 2026V-REX: Efficient Specialist VLM Training for Veterinary X-Rays20 Aug 2026
- 2026Directional Confusions Reveal Divergent Inductive Biases Through Rate-Distortion Geometry in Human and Machine Vision23 Apr 2026
- 2025No Need for Learning to Defer? A Training Free Deferral Framework to Multiple Experts through Conformal Prediction16 Sep 2025
- 2025When VLMs Meet Image Classification: Test Sets Renovation via Missing Label Identification22 May 2025
- 2024Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple Experts18 Nov 2024
- 2024Human-AI Collaborative Multi-modal Multi-rater Learning for Endometriosis Diagnosis3 Sep 2024
- 2024Learning to Complement and to Defer to Multiple Users9 Jul 2024
- 2024A Survey on Human-AI Collaboration with Large Foundation Models7 Mar 2024
- 2023The Importance of Human-Labeled Data in the Era of LLMs18 Jun 2023