mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robustness Analysis against Adversarial Patch Attacks in Fully Unmanned Stores

arXiv 2505.08835 ↗First posted 13 May 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The advent of convenient and efficient fully unmanned stores equipped with artificial intelligence-based automated checkout systems marks a new era in retail. However, these systems have inherent artificial intelligence security vulnerabilities, which are exploited via adversarial patch attacks, particularly in physical environments. This study demonstrated that adversarial patches can severely disrupt object detection models used in unmanned stores, leading to issues such as theft, inventory discrepancies, and interference. We investigated three types of adversarial patch attacks -- Hiding, Creating, and Altering attacks -- and highlighted their effectiveness. We also introduce the novel color histogram similarity loss function by leveraging attacker knowledge of the color information of a target class object. Besides the traditional confusion-matrix-based attack success rate, we introduce a new bounding-boxes-based metric to analyze the practical impact of these attacks. Starting with attacks on object detection models trained on snack and fruit datasets in a digital environment, we evaluated the effectiveness of adversarial patches in a physical testbed that mimicked a real unmanned store with RGB cameras and realistic conditions. Furthermore, we assessed the robustness of these attacks in black-box scenarios, demonstrating that shadow attacks can enhance success rates of attacks even without direct access to model parameters. Our study underscores the necessity for robust defense strategies to protect unmanned stores from adversarial threats. Highlighting the limitations of the current defense mechanisms in real-time detection systems and discussing various proactive measures, we provide insights into improving the robustness of object detection models and fortifying unmanned retail environments against these attacks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2025.

Builds on

27 of 49 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  6. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
  7. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  8. 2019Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 454
  9. 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
  10. 2018DPatch: An Adversarial Patch Attack on Object Detectorscited by 146
  11. 2018Are adversarial examples inevitable?cited by 113
  12. 2017Learning non-maximum suppressioncited by 112
15 more
  1. 2019On Physical Adversarial Patches for Object Detectioncited by 93
  2. 2021PatchCleanser: Certifiably Robust Defense against Adversarial Patches for Any Image Classifiercited by 63
  3. 2020Adversarial Training against Location-Optimized Adversarial Patchescited by 50
  4. 2021TnT Attacks! Universal Naturalistic Adversarial Patches Against Deep Neural Network Systemscited by 36
  5. 2021Physical Adversarial Attacks on an Aerial Imagery Object Detectorcited by 35
  6. 2023Jedi: Entropy-based Localization and Removal of Adversarial Patchescited by 35
  7. 2022Distilling Robust and Non-Robust Features in Adversarial Examples by Information Bottleneckcited by 30
  8. 2021PatchGuard++: Efficient Provable Attack Detection against Adversarial Patchescited by 29
  9. 2023Unified Adversarial Patch for Cross-modal Attacks in the Physical Worldcited by 27
  10. 2022ObjectSeeker: Certifiably Robust Object Detection against Patch Hiding Attacks via Patch-agnostic Maskingcited by 22
  11. 2023TPatch: A Triggered Physical Adversarial Patchcited by 22
  12. 2020Vax-a-Net: Training-time Defence Against Adversarial Patch Attackscited by 11
  13. 2022Defending From Physically-Realizable Adversarial Attacks Through Internal Over-Activation Analysiscited by 10
  14. 2023How many dimensions are required to find an adversarial example?cited by 5
  15. 2016Comparative study of histogram distance measures for re-identificationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.