Remedy: Learning Machine Translation Evaluation from Human Preferences with Reward Modeling
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
A key challenge in MT evaluation is the inherent noise and inconsistency of human ratings. Regression-based neural metrics struggle with this noise, while prompting LLMs shows promise at system-level evaluation but performs poorly at segment level. In this work, we propose ReMedy, a novel MT metric framework that reformulates translation evaluation as a reward modeling task. Instead of regressing on imperfect human ratings directly, ReMedy learns relative translation quality using pairwise preference data, resulting in a more reliable evaluation. In extensive experiments across WMT22-24 shared tasks (39 language pairs, 111 MT systems), ReMedy achieves state-of-the-art performance at both segment- and system-level evaluation. Specifically, ReMedy-9B surpasses larger WMT winners and massive closed LLMs such as MetricX-13B, XCOMET-Ensemble, GEMBA-GPT-4, PaLM-540B, and finetuned PaLM2. Further analyses demonstrate that ReMedy delivers superior capability in detecting translation errors and evaluating low-quality translations.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 31 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2025.
Builds on
31 of 56 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 29
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,818
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,301
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
17 more
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 560
- 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
- 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 327
- 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
- 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 163
- 2023A Paradigm Shift in Machine Translation: Boosting Translation Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 89
- 2023Scaling up COMETKIWI: Unbabel-IST 2023 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 88
- 2023Ties Matter: Meta-Evaluating Modern Metrics with Pairwise Accuracy and Tie Calibrationcited by 74
- 2021A Statistical Analysis of Summarization Evaluation Metrics using Resampling Methodscited by 72
- 2022ACES: Translation Accuracy Challenge Sets for Evaluating Machine Translation Metricscited by 25
- 2024Improving Statistical Significance in Human Evaluation of Automatic Metrics via Soft Pairwise Accuracycited by 25
- 2024Machine Translation Meta Evaluation through Translation Accuracy Challenge Setscited by 18
- 2024MT-Ranker: Reference-free machine translation evaluation by inter-system rankingcited by 14
- 2023Towards a Better Understanding of Variations in Zero-Shot Neural Machine Translation Performancecited by 10
- 2025Enhancing Human Evaluation in Machine Translation with Comparative Judgmentcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 6.
9 papers.
- 2025M2PO: Multi-Perspective Multi-Pair Preference Optimization for Machine Translationcited by 4
- 2025Investigating Test-Time Scaling with Reranking for Machine Translationcited by 3
- 2026What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary Translationcited by 2
- 2025Remedy-R: Generative Reasoning for Machine Translation Evaluation without Error Annotationscited by 1
- 2026PEAR: Pairwise Evaluation for Automatic Relative Scoring in Machine Translationcited by 1
- 2026STAR : Sentence Translation Alignment Rate for Document-to-Document Machine Translationcited by 1
- 2026Beyond Scalar Scores: Reinforcement Learning for Error-Aware Quality Estimation of Machine Translationcited by 0
- 2026Model-Based Quality Assessment for Massively Multilingual Parallel Datacited by 0
- 2026LocQE: Principled Domain Adaptation for Localisation Quality Estimation by Leveraging Post-Editscited by 0
- 2026LocQE: Principled Domain Adaptation for Localisation Quality Estimation by Leveraging Post-Edits16 Sep 2026
- 2026STAR : Sentence Translation Alignment Rate for Document-to-Document Machine Translation27 Aug 2026
- 2026Model-Based Quality Assessment for Massively Multilingual Parallel Data29 May 2026
- 2026What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary Translation13 May 2026
- 2026Beyond Scalar Scores: Reinforcement Learning for Error-Aware Quality Estimation of Machine Translation9 Feb 2026
- 2026PEAR: Pairwise Evaluation for Automatic Relative Scoring in Machine Translation25 Jan 2026
- 2025Remedy-R: Generative Reasoning for Machine Translation Evaluation without Error Annotations21 Dec 2025
- 2025M2PO: Multi-Perspective Multi-Pair Preference Optimization for Machine Translation15 Oct 2025
- 2025Investigating Test-Time Scaling with Reranking for Machine Translation23 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Improving Machine Translation with Human Feedback: An Exploration of Quality Estimation as a Reward Model
- 2024Advancing Translation Preference Modeling with RLHF: A Step Towards Cost-Effective Solution
- 2024Is Preference Alignment Always the Best Option to Enhance LLM-Based Translation? An Empirical Analysis
- 2024Modeling User Preferences with Automatic Metrics: Creating a High-Quality Preference Dataset for Machine Translation
- 2023Aligning Neural Machine Translation Models: Human Feedback in Training and Inference
- 2025TransEvalnia: Reasoning-based Evaluation and Ranking of Translations
- 2024Fine-Grained Reward Optimization for Machine Translation using Error Severity Mappings
- 2025MT-RewardTree: A Comprehensive Framework for Advancing LLM-Based Machine Translation via Reward Modeling