mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LocQE: Principled Domain Adaptation for Localisation Quality Estimation by Leveraging Post-Edits

arXiv 2609.18720 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learned quality estimation (QE) models such as COMETKiwi are widespread and work well for general machine translation evaluation. However, they are known to struggle on unseen domains, limiting their performance in a real-world localisation context. We show that they are insensitive to some important factors in localisation, such as whether numbers are translated accurately, or even whether the correct number of spaces and punctuation are preserved in a translation. Further, a key capability for optimisation of machine translation is the ability of QE models to accurately rank different translations of a single segment, which suffers significantly from the domain transfer. In the absence of large-scale direct assessment data, we propose principled fine-tuning approaches to reduce the domain gap with even small amounts of post-editing data. Using a multi-task fine-tuning approach and a simple tokeniser intervention, we create a QE model which proves markedly better at distinguishing preferred post-edits from rejected initial translations in a localisation context. We show that preferences and artificial continuous scores stabilise each other, and argue that to calibrate metrics both in terms of their absolute scores and comparisons between translation of the same source, both types of signal are needed.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

Builds on

27 of 41 references.

References · 27

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  3. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  5. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  6. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  7. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  8. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
  9. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  10. 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
  11. 2020InfoXLM: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Cross-Lingual Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 237
  12. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
15 more
  1. 2024Tokenization Is More Than Compressioncited by 89
  2. 2024Error Span Annotation: A Balanced Approach for Human Evaluation of Machine Translationcited by 62
  3. 2022English Contrastive Learning Can Learn Universal Cross-lingual Sentence Embeddingscited by 26
  4. 2025BOUQuET: dataset, Benchmark and Open initiative for Universal Quality Evaluation in Translationcited by 22
  5. 2024Fine-Tuned Machine Translation Metrics Struggle in Unseen Domainscited by 21
  6. 2024Machine Translation Meta Evaluation through Translation Accuracy Challenge Setscited by 18
  7. 2023Poor Man's Quality Estimation: Predicting Reference-Based MT Metrics Without the Referencecited by 11
  8. 2025Remedy: Learning Machine Translation Evaluation from Human Preferences with Reward Modelingcited by 9
  9. 2024Cross-lingual Human-Preference Alignment for Neural Machine Translation with Direct Quality Optimizationcited by 5
  10. 2020A Parallel Evaluation Data Set of Software Documentation with Document Structure Annotationcited by 4
  11. 2023Tailoring Domain Adaptation for Machine Translation Quality Estimationcited by 4
  12. 2023ACES: Translation Accuracy Challenge Sets at WMT 2023cited by 3
  13. 2025Don't Sweat the Small Stuff: Segment-Level Meta-Evaluation Based on Pairwise Difference Correlationcited by 2
  14. 2026Who Watches the Watchmen? Humans Disagree With Translation Metrics on Unseen Domainscited by 2
  15. 2026PEAR: Pairwise Evaluation for Automatic Relative Scoring in Machine Translationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.