Remedy-R: Generative Reasoning for Machine Translation Evaluation without Error Annotations
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Over the years, automatic MT metrics have hillclimbed benchmarks and presented strong and sometimes human-level agreement with human ratings. Yet they remain black-box, offering little insight into their decision-making and often failing under real-world out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs. We introduce Remedy-R, a reasoning-driven generative MT metric trained with reinforcement learning from pairwise translation preferences, without requiring error-span annotations or distillation from closed LLMs. Remedy-R produces step-by-step analyses of accuracy, fluency, and completeness, followed by a final score, enabling more interpretable assessments. With only 60K training pairs across two language pairs, Remedy-R remains competitive with top scalar metrics and GPT-4-based judges on WMT22-24 meta-evaluation, generalizes to other languages, and exhibits strong robustness on OOD stress tests. Moreover, Remedy-R models generate self-reflective feedback that can be reused for translation improvement. Building on this finding, we introduce Remedy-R Agent, a simple evaluate-revise pipeline that leverages Remedy-R's evaluation analysis to refine translations. This agent consistently improves translation quality across diverse models, including Qwen2.5, ALMA-R, GPT-4o-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash, suggesting that Remedy-R's reasoning captures translation-relevant information and is practically useful.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 41 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2025.
Builds on
41 of 56 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025TransEvalnia: Reasoning-based Evaluation and Ranking of Translations17 Jul
- 2025Please Translate Again: Two Simple Experiments on Whether Human-Like Reasoning Helps Translation5 Jun
- 2025MT-R1-Zero: Advancing LLM-based Machine Translation via R1-Zero-like Reinforcement Learning14 Apr
Other references · 38
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
- 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 450
- 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
- 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 390
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
26 more
- 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 260
- 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 161
- 2023GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4cited by 143
- 2023The Devil is in the Errors: Leveraging Large Language Models for Fine-grained Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 95
- 2024MetricX-24: The Google Submission to the WMT 2024 Metrics Shared Taskcited by 92
- 2023A Paradigm Shift in Machine Translation: Boosting Translation Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 88
- 2023Error Analysis Prompting Enables Human-Like Translation Evaluation in Large Language Modelscited by 87
- 2025WMT24++: Expanding the Language Coverage of WMT24 to 55 Languages & Dialectscited by 79
- 2021A Statistical Analysis of Summarization Evaluation Metrics using Resampling Methodscited by 71
- 2023Ties Matter: Meta-Evaluating Modern Metrics with Pairwise Accuracy and Tie Calibrationcited by 71
- 2023LLMRefine: Pinpointing and Refining Large Language Models via Fine-Grained Actionable Feedbackcited by 39
- 2024Translating Step-by-Step: Decomposing the Translation Process for Improved Translation Quality of Long-Form Textscited by 31
- 2022ACES: Translation Accuracy Challenge Sets for Evaluating Machine Translation Metricscited by 25
- 2024Improving Statistical Significance in Human Evaluation of Automatic Metrics via Soft Pairwise Accuracycited by 25
- 2024MQM-APE: Toward High-Quality Error Annotation Predictors with Automatic Post-Editing in LLM Translation Evaluatorscited by 22
- 2024Guardians of the Machine Translation Meta-Evaluation: Sentinel Metrics Fall In!cited by 21
- 2024Machine Translation Meta Evaluation through Translation Accuracy Challenge Setscited by 18
- 2024xTower: A Multilingual LLM for Explaining and Correcting Translation Errorscited by 17
- 2024M-MAD: Multidimensional Multi-Agent Debate for Advanced Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 13
- 2025Has Machine Translation Evaluation Achieved Human Parity? The Human Reference and the Limits of Progresscited by 10
- 2025Remedy: Learning Machine Translation Evaluation from Human Preferences with Reward Modelingcited by 9
- 2025Hunyuan-MT Technical Reportcited by 7
- 2024What do Large Language Models Need for Machine Translation Evaluation?cited by 6
- 2025Adding Chocolate to Mint: Mitigating Metric Interference in Machine Translationcited by 6
- 2025HiMATE: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 3
- 2025Investigating Test-Time Scaling with Reranking for Machine Translationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Aligning Neural Machine Translation Models: Human Feedback in Training and Inference
- 2024Advancing Translation Preference Modeling with RLHF: A Step Towards Cost-Effective Solution
- 2026Translate-R1: Cost-Aware Translation Tool Use via Reinforcement Learning
- 2025R1-T1: Fully Incentivizing Translation Capability in LLMs via Reasoning Learning
- 2025LLMs Are Not Scorers: Rethinking MT Evaluation with Generation-Based Methods
- 2025RL from Teacher-Model Refinement: Gradual Imitation Learning for Machine Translation
- 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modeling
- 2025Are Large Reasoning Models Good Translation Evaluators? Analysis and Performance Boost