ProgRoCC: A Progressive Approach to Rough Crowd Counting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As the number of individuals in a crowd grows, enumeration-based techniques become increasingly infeasible and their estimates increasingly unreliable. We propose instead an estimation-based version of the problem: we label Rough Crowd Counting that delivers better accuracy on the basis of training data that is easier to acquire. Rough crowd counting requires only rough annotations of the number of targets in an image, instead of the more traditional, and far more expensive, per-target annotations. We propose an approach to the rough crowd counting problem based on CLIP, termed ProgRoCC. Specifically, we introduce a progressive estimation learning strategy that determines the object count through a coarse-to-fine approach. This approach delivers answers quickly, outperforms the state-of-the-art in semi- and weakly-supervised crowd counting. In addition, we design a vision-language matching adapter that optimizes key-value pairs by mining effective matches of two modalities to refine the visual features, thereby improving the final performance. Extensive experimental results on three widely adopted crowd counting datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2025.
Builds on
24 of 32 references.
References · 24
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Contrastive Learning of Medical Visual Representations from Paired Images and Textcited by 641
- 2018CSRNet: Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks for Understanding the Highly Congested Scenescited by 267
- 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Tencited by 198
- 2018Composition Loss for Counting, Density Map Estimation and Localization in Dense Crowdscited by 186
- 2019Bayesian Loss for Crowd Count Estimation with Point Supervisioncited by 162
- 2020Distribution Matching for Crowd Countingcited by 143
- 2020JHU-CROWD++: Large-Scale Crowd Counting Dataset and A Benchmark Methodcited by 109
- 2023CLIP-Count: Towards Text-Guided Zero-Shot Object Countingcited by 83
- 2022An End-to-End Transformer Model for Crowd Localizationcited by 74
- 2019Locate, Size and Count: Accurately Resolving People in Dense Crowds via Detectioncited by 73
- 2021TransCrowd: weakly-supervised crowd counting with transformerscited by 61
12 more
- 2023CrowdCLIP: Unsupervised Crowd Counting via Vision-Language Modelcited by 47
- 2023Point-Query Quadtree for Crowd Counting, Localization, and Morecited by 40
- 2020Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting via Self-Training on Surrogate Taskscited by 35
- 2020Towards Using Count-level Weak Supervision for Crowd Countingcited by 33
- 2021CCTrans: Simplifying and Improving Crowd Counting with Transformercited by 30
- 2023S-CLIP: Semi-supervised Vision-Language Learning using Few Specialist Captionscited by 30
- 2023Knowledge-Aware Prompt Tuning for Generalizable Vision-Language Modelscited by 30
- 2020Completely Self-Supervised Crowd Counting via Distribution Matchingcited by 22
- 2019Crowd Counting with Decomposed Uncertaintycited by 20
- 2022Redesigning Multi-Scale Neural Network for Crowd Countingcited by 17
- 2023Counting Crowds in Bad Weathercited by 14
- 2023Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting with Contextual Modeling: Facilitating Holistic Understanding of Crowd Scenescited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.