mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ELT-Bench: An End-to-End Benchmark for Evaluating AI Agents on ELT Pipelines

arXiv 2504.04808 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2025cs.DB cs.AIcited by 15

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Practitioners are increasingly turning to Extract-Load-Transform (ELT) pipelines with the widespread adoption of cloud data warehouses. However, designing these pipelines often involves significant manual work to ensure correctness. Recent advances in AI-based methods, which have shown strong capabilities in data tasks, such as text-to-SQL, present an opportunity to alleviate manual efforts in developing ELT pipelines. Unfortunately, current benchmarks in data engineering only evaluate isolated tasks, such as using data tools and writing data transformation queries, leaving a significant gap in evaluating AI agents for generating end-to-end ELT pipelines. To fill this gap, we introduce ELT-Bench, an end-to-end benchmark designed to assess the capabilities of AI agents to build ELT pipelines. ELT-Bench consists of 100 pipelines, including 835 source tables and 203 data models across various domains. By simulating realistic scenarios involving the integration of diverse data sources and the use of popular data tools, ELT-Bench evaluates AI agents' abilities in handling complex data engineering workflows. AI agents must interact with databases and data tools, write code and SQL queries, and orchestrate every pipeline stage. We evaluate two representative code agent frameworks, Spider-Agent and SWE-Agent, using six popular Large Language Models (LLMs) on ELT-Bench. The highest-performing agent, Spider-Agent Claude-3.7-Sonnet with extended thinking, correctly generates only 3.9% of data models, with an average cost of 4.30 and 89.3 steps per pipeline. Our experimental results demonstrate the challenges of ELT-Bench and highlight the need for a more advanced AI agent to reduce manual effort in ELT workflows. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/uiuc-kang-lab/ELT-Bench.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 36 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.

Builds on

36 of 89 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024DocETL: Agentic Query Rewriting and Evaluation for Complex Document Processing16 Oct
  2. 2024DA-Code: Agent Data Science Code Generation Benchmark for Large Language Models9 Oct
  3. 2024Spider2-V: How Far Are Multimodal Agents From Automating Data Science and Engineering Workflows?15 Jul
  4. 2024AutoWebGLM: A Large Language Model-based Web Navigating Agent4 Apr
  5. 2024Data Interpreter: An LLM Agent For Data Science28 Feb
  6. 2024InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis Tasks10 Jan
  7. 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation5 Oct

Other references · 29

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  5. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  6. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  7. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  8. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  9. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 956
  10. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
  11. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 667
  12. 2024Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agentscited by 537
17 more
  1. 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 465
  2. 2022DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 442
  3. 2023Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluationcited by 378
  4. 2023Ghost in the Minecraft: Generally Capable Agents for Open-World Environments via Large Language Models with Text-based Knowledge and Memorycited by 288
  5. 2024AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvementcited by 272
  6. 2024Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflowscited by 223
  7. 2024CodeS: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Text-to-SQLcited by 183
  8. 2023C3: Zero-shot Text-to-SQL with ChatGPTcited by 159
  9. 2024Autonomous Evaluation and Refinement of Digital Agentscited by 136
  10. 2017SQLNet: Generating Structured Queries From Natural Language Without Reinforcement Learningcited by 135
  11. 2021LGESQL: Line Graph Enhanced Text-to-SQL Model with Mixed Local and Non-Local Relationscited by 119
  12. 2017Learning a Neural Semantic Parser from User Feedbackcited by 98
  13. 2024Text2SQL is Not Enough: Unifying AI and Databases with TAGcited by 34
  14. 2024Understanding the Effects of Noise in Text-to-SQL: An Examination of the BIRD-Bench Benchmarkcited by 33
  15. 2024TQA-Bench: Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Table Question Answeringcited by 17
  16. 2023Data Pipeline Quality: Influencing Factors, Root Causes of Data-related Issues, and Processing Problem Areas for Developerscited by 5
  17. 2024A Survey of Pipeline Tools for Data Engineeringcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 8.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026DataClawEval: A Benchmark for Data Engineering Agents in Real Industrial Harness
  2. 2025KramaBench: A Benchmark for AI Systems on Data-to-Insight Pipelines over Data Lakes
  3. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering
  4. 2025MLR-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on Open-Ended Machine Learning Research
  5. 2026Benchmark Radar: A Living Database and Search Engine for AI Benchmarks and Evaluation
  6. 2025ML-Dev-Bench: Comparative Analysis of AI Agents on ML development workflows
  7. 2026MLS-Bench: A Holistic and Rigorous Assessment of AI Systems on Building Better AI
  8. 2026DeltaML-Bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Real-World Research Repositories