mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DataClawEval: A Benchmark for Data Engineering Agents in Real Industrial Harness

arXiv 2607.28033 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based agents are increasingly being deployed to automate complex workflows, promising to revolutionize data management and processing. However, existing benchmarks predominantly focus on simplified Text-to-SQL translation or data analysis, leaving the critical and complex domain of end-to-end data engineering largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce DataClawEval, the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically to evaluate the end-to-end task completion capabilities of autonomous agents in real-world data engineering scenarios. Built upon production-grade code authored by professional enterprise data engineers, it comprises 100 rigorous, end-to-end tasks spanning five execution engines: PySpark, MySQL, HiveSQL, PrestoSQL/Trino, and FlinkSQL. Rather than non-deterministic LLM-as-a-judge scoring, each task is executed within a case-specific, isolated sandbox and graded by deterministic, rule-based scripts. Evaluating 16 frontier agents exposes critical limitations: The strongest model attains only 74.9 overall, and no single model dominates, as each excels on a different engine, revealing strict domain specialization rather than omnipotent proficiency. Thus, autonomous data engineering remains a formidable, unresolved challenge. We release our dataset, containerized environments, and deterministic evaluation scripts at https://github.com/Dicemy/DataClawEval/tree/master

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

Builds on

12 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis Tasks10 Jan

Other references · 11

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  3. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
  4. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  5. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  6. 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 587
  7. 2022DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 452
  8. 2023MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language Feedbackcited by 297
  9. 2024Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflowscited by 232
  10. 2023Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignmentcited by 169
  11. 2025FDABench: A Benchmark for Data Agents on Analytical Queries over Heterogeneous Datacited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Data Intelligence Agents: Interpreting, Modeling, and Querying Enterprise Data via Autonomous Coding Agents
  2. 2026AgenticDataBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Data Agents
  3. 2025BAPPA: Benchmarking Agents, Plans, and Pipelines for Automated Text-to-SQL Generation
  4. 2025DataGovBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Real-World Data Governance Workflows
  5. 2026Exploring Autonomous Agentic Data Engineering for Model Specialization
  6. 2025DAComp: Benchmarking Data Agents across the Full Data Intelligence Lifecycle
  7. 2025A Survey of Data Agents: Emerging Paradigm or Overstated Hype?
  8. 2025LLM and Agent-Driven Data Analysis: A Systematic Approach for Enterprise Applications and System-level Deployment