Beyond Deepfake vs Real: Facial Deepfake Detection in the Open-Set Paradigm
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Facial forgery methods such as deepfakes can be misused for identity manipulation and spreading misinformation. They have evolved alongside advancements in generative AI, leading to new and more sophisticated forgery techniques that diverge from existing ``known" methods. Conventional deepfake detection methods use the closed-set paradigm, thus limiting their applicability to detecting forgeries created using methods that are not part of the training dataset. In this paper, we propose a shift from the closed-set paradigm for deepfake detection. In the open-set paradigm, models are designed not only to identify images created by known facial forgery methods but also to identify and flag those produced by previously unknown methods as `unknown' and not as unforged or real or nmanipulated. In this paper, we propose an open-set deepfake classification algorithm based on supervised contrastive learning. The open-set paradigm used in our model allows it to function as a more robust tool capable of handling emerging and unseen deepfake techniques, enhancing reliability and confidence, and complementing forensic analysis. In the open-set paradigm, we identify three groups, including the `unknown' group that is neither considered a known deepfake nor real. We investigate deepfake open-set classification across three scenarios: classifying deepfakes from unknown methods not as real, distinguishing real images from deepfakes, and classifying deepfakes from known methods, using the FaceForensics++ dataset as a benchmark. Our method achieves state-of-the-art results in the first two tasks and competitive results in the third task.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2025.
Builds on
44 of 57 references.
References · 44
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
- 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,036
- 2016Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 895
32 more
- 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 631
- 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 573
- 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 533
- 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 518
- 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 469
- 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
- 2018Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifactscited by 318
- 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 309
- 2018Exposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Posescited by 294
- 2020Lips Don't Lie: A Generalisable and Robust Approach to Face Forgery Detectioncited by 286
- 2021Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Featurescited by 261
- 2019On the Detection of Digital Face Manipulationcited by 259
- 2021Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domaincited by 241
- 2023Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applicationscited by 206
- 2018Capsule-Forensics: Using Capsule Networks to Detect Forged Images and Videoscited by 180
- 2020Learning Self-Consistency for Deepfake Detectioncited by 179
- 2023UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 177
- 2023DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detectioncited by 162
- 2016Revisiting Multiple Instance Neural Networkscited by 119
- 2021Representative Forgery Mining for Fake Face Detectioncited by 108
- 2023AltFreezing for More General Video Face Forgery Detectioncited by 78
- 2022CORE: Consistent Representation Learning for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 73
- 2021Exploiting Fine-grained Face Forgery Clues via Progressive Enhancement Learningcited by 60
- 2020Sharp Multiple Instance Learning for DeepFake Video Detectioncited by 54
- 2020Face Forgery Detection by 3D Decompositioncited by 53
- 2019SWALP : Stochastic Weight Averaging in Low-Precision Trainingcited by 40
- 2022Exploring Disentangled Content Information for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 36
- 2022The Familiarity Hypothesis: Explaining the Behavior of Deep Open Set Methodscited by 28
- 2020A Convolutional LSTM based Residual Network for Deepfake Video Detectioncited by 26
- 2021TAR: Generalized Forensic Framework to Detect Deepfakes using Weakly Supervised Learningcited by 19
- 2021Learning to Disentangle GAN Fingerprint for Fake Image Attributioncited by 19
- 2020Generalized Zero and Few-Shot Transfer for Facial Forgery Detectioncited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.