One Stone, Two Birds: Enhancing Adversarial Defense Through the Lens of Distributional Discrepancy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Statistical adversarial data detection (SADD) detects whether an upcoming batch contains adversarial examples (AEs) by measuring the distributional discrepancies between clean examples (CEs) and AEs. In this paper, we explore the strength of SADD-based methods by theoretically showing that minimizing distributional discrepancy can help reduce the expected loss on AEs. Despite these advantages, SADD-based methods have a potential limitation: they discard inputs that are detected as AEs, leading to the loss of useful information within those inputs. To address this limitation, we propose a two-pronged adversarial defense method, named Distributional-discrepancy-based Adversarial Defense (DAD). In the training phase, DAD first optimizes the test power of the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to derive MMD-OPT, which is a stone that kills two birds. MMD-OPT first serves as a guiding signal to minimize the distributional discrepancy between CEs and AEs to train a denoiser. Then, it serves as a discriminator to differentiate CEs and AEs during inference. Overall, in the inference stage, DAD consists of a two-pronged process: (1) directly feeding the detected CEs into the classifier, and (2) removing noise from the detected AEs by the distributional-discrepancy-based denoiser. Extensive experiments show that DAD outperforms current state-of-the-art (SOTA) defense methods by simultaneously improving clean and robust accuracy on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet-1K against adaptive white-box attacks. Codes are publicly available at: https://github.com/tmlr-group/DAD.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.
Builds on
60 of 79 references.
References · 60
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
38 more
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 685
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
- 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 476
- 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
- 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
- 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 334
- 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 316
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 282
- 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 278
- 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 269
- 2017PixelDefend: Leveraging Generative Models to Understand and Defend against Adversarial Examplescited by 244
- 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 234
- 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 204
- 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 200
- 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
- 2020A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 180
- 2019Efficient Decision-based Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognitioncited by 175
- 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 172
- 2020Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat Modelscited by 137
- 2021Adversarial purification with Score-based generative modelscited by 134
- 2022(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!cited by 132
- 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 130
- 2021Robust Learning Meets Generative Models: Can Proxy Distributions Improve Adversarial Robustness?cited by 113
- 2022Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definitioncited by 111
- 2021Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World Attackscited by 101
- 2022Guided Diffusion Model for Adversarial Purificationcited by 92
- 2023Robust Classification via a Single Diffusion Modelcited by 79
- 2020Adversarial Robustness on In- and Out-Distribution Improves Explainabilitycited by 73
- 2019ME-Net: Towards Effective Adversarial Robustness with Matrix Estimationcited by 65
- 2023Robust Evaluation of Diffusion-Based Adversarial Purificationcited by 65
- 2020Stochastic Security: Adversarial Defense Using Long-Run Dynamics of Energy-Based Modelscited by 58
- 2021Probabilistic Margins for Instance Reweighting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 57
- 2018Improving the Generalization of Adversarial Training with Domain Adaptationcited by 48
- 2020Maximum Mean Discrepancy Test is Aware of Adversarial Attackscited by 44
50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.