mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

USAD: Uncertainty-aware Statistical Adversarial Detection

arXiv 2606.27832 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Statistical adversarial detection (SAD) treats detection as a two-sample test. Given a reference set of clean examples (CEs) and a batch of queries, potentially containing an unknown mixture of CEs and adversarial examples (AEs), SAD decides whether the query distribution drifts away from the CE distribution while controlling the false-alarm rate. Existing SAD-based methods mainly use maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to measure the distributional discrepancy. However, MMD's distributional properties limit its ability to capture characteristic uncertainty patterns of AEs that are crucial for detection: AEs typically exhibit abnormal feature spread (i.e., global uncertainty) and instability under perturbations (i.e., local uncertainty). To close the gap, we propose Uncertainty-aware Statistical Adversarial Detection (USAD), which explicitly captures these uncertainty patterns with two new statistics: (1) Variance Discrepancy (VD), which measures the difference in feature spread between AEs and CEs to capture global uncertainty differences. (2) Perturbation-based Covariance Discrepancy (PCD), which compares feature covariance under Gaussian perturbations to capture local uncertainty differences. By aggregating VD and PCD, USAD achieves superior detection performances over baseline methods against various adversarial attacks, highlighting the importance of considering characteristic behaviors of AEs for effective SAD. Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/USAD.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2026.

Builds on

44 of 59 references.

References · 44

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,067
  8. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  9. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  10. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  11. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  12. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
32 more
  1. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  2. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
  3. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
  4. 2016Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyondcited by 360
  5. 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 333
  6. 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
  7. 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 244
  8. 2021A Variational Perspective on Diffusion-Based Generative Models and Score Matchingcited by 182
  9. 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
  10. 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 178
  11. 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 129
  12. 2016Robustness of classifiers: from adversarial to random noisecited by 87
  13. 2019The Odds are Odd: A Statistical Test for Detecting Adversarial Examplescited by 75
  14. 2021MMD Aggregated Two-Sample Testcited by 74
  15. 2023Diffusion-Based Adversarial Sample Generation for Improved Stealthiness and Controllabilitycited by 66
  16. 2018Sparse Adversarial Perturbations for Videoscited by 56
  17. 2021Detecting Adversarial Examples Is (Nearly) As Hard As Classifying Themcited by 46
  18. 2020Maximum Mean Discrepancy Test is Aware of Adversarial Attackscited by 44
  19. 2021LiBRe: A Practical Bayesian Approach to Adversarial Detectioncited by 40
  20. 2021On the Certified Robustness for Ensemble Models and Beyondcited by 40
  21. 2023DiffAttack: Evasion Attacks Against Diffusion-Based Adversarial Purificationcited by 36
  22. 2021Evading Adversarial Example Detection Defenses with Orthogonal Projected Gradient Descentcited by 34
  23. 2023MMD-FUSE: Learning and Combining Kernels for Two-Sample Testing Without Data Splittingcited by 33
  24. 2022Efficient Aggregated Kernel Tests using Incomplete U-statisticscited by 27
  25. 2019Classification Logit Two-sample Testing by Neural Networkscited by 25
  26. 2023Detecting Adversarial Data by Probing Multiple Perturbations Using Expected Perturbation Scorecited by 20
  27. 2023Boosting the Power of Kernel Two-Sample Testscited by 10
  28. 2024Improving Accuracy-robustness Trade-off via Pixel Reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 6
  29. 2025DUAL: Learning Diverse Kernels for Aggregated Two-sample and Independence Testingcited by 6
  30. 2024Sparse-PGD: A Unified Framework for Sparse Adversarial Perturbations Generationcited by 4
  31. 2025One Stone, Two Birds: Enhancing Adversarial Defense Through the Lens of Distributional Discrepancycited by 3
  32. 2025Sample-Specific Noise Injection For Diffusion-Based Adversarial Purificationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.