USAD: Uncertainty-aware Statistical Adversarial Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Statistical adversarial detection (SAD) treats detection as a two-sample test. Given a reference set of clean examples (CEs) and a batch of queries, potentially containing an unknown mixture of CEs and adversarial examples (AEs), SAD decides whether the query distribution drifts away from the CE distribution while controlling the false-alarm rate. Existing SAD-based methods mainly use maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to measure the distributional discrepancy. However, MMD's distributional properties limit its ability to capture characteristic uncertainty patterns of AEs that are crucial for detection: AEs typically exhibit abnormal feature spread (i.e., global uncertainty) and instability under perturbations (i.e., local uncertainty). To close the gap, we propose Uncertainty-aware Statistical Adversarial Detection (USAD), which explicitly captures these uncertainty patterns with two new statistics: (1) Variance Discrepancy (VD), which measures the difference in feature spread between AEs and CEs to capture global uncertainty differences. (2) Perturbation-based Covariance Discrepancy (PCD), which compares feature covariance under Gaussian perturbations to capture local uncertainty differences. By aggregating VD and PCD, USAD achieves superior detection performances over baseline methods against various adversarial attacks, highlighting the importance of considering characteristic behaviors of AEs for effective SAD. Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/USAD.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2026.
Builds on
44 of 59 references.
References · 44
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,067
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
32 more
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2016Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyondcited by 360
- 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 333
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
- 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 244
- 2021A Variational Perspective on Diffusion-Based Generative Models and Score Matchingcited by 182
- 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
- 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 178
- 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 129
- 2016Robustness of classifiers: from adversarial to random noisecited by 87
- 2019The Odds are Odd: A Statistical Test for Detecting Adversarial Examplescited by 75
- 2021MMD Aggregated Two-Sample Testcited by 74
- 2023Diffusion-Based Adversarial Sample Generation for Improved Stealthiness and Controllabilitycited by 66
- 2018Sparse Adversarial Perturbations for Videoscited by 56
- 2021Detecting Adversarial Examples Is (Nearly) As Hard As Classifying Themcited by 46
- 2020Maximum Mean Discrepancy Test is Aware of Adversarial Attackscited by 44
- 2021LiBRe: A Practical Bayesian Approach to Adversarial Detectioncited by 40
- 2021On the Certified Robustness for Ensemble Models and Beyondcited by 40
- 2023DiffAttack: Evasion Attacks Against Diffusion-Based Adversarial Purificationcited by 36
- 2021Evading Adversarial Example Detection Defenses with Orthogonal Projected Gradient Descentcited by 34
- 2023MMD-FUSE: Learning and Combining Kernels for Two-Sample Testing Without Data Splittingcited by 33
- 2022Efficient Aggregated Kernel Tests using Incomplete U-statisticscited by 27
- 2019Classification Logit Two-sample Testing by Neural Networkscited by 25
- 2023Detecting Adversarial Data by Probing Multiple Perturbations Using Expected Perturbation Scorecited by 20
- 2023Boosting the Power of Kernel Two-Sample Testscited by 10
- 2024Improving Accuracy-robustness Trade-off via Pixel Reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 6
- 2025DUAL: Learning Diverse Kernels for Aggregated Two-sample and Independence Testingcited by 6
- 2024Sparse-PGD: A Unified Framework for Sparse Adversarial Perturbations Generationcited by 4
- 2025One Stone, Two Birds: Enhancing Adversarial Defense Through the Lens of Distributional Discrepancycited by 3
- 2025Sample-Specific Noise Injection For Diffusion-Based Adversarial Purificationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.