mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat Models

arXiv 2006.12655 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2020cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 137

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A key challenge in adversarial robustness is the lack of a precise mathematical characterization of human perception, used in the very definition of adversarial attacks that are imperceptible to human eyes. Most current attacks and defenses try to avoid this issue by considering restrictive adversarial threat models such as those bounded by L2 or L_∞ distance, spatial perturbations, etc. However, models that are robust against any of these restrictive threat models are still fragile against other threat models. To resolve this issue, we propose adversarial training against the set of all imperceptible adversarial examples, approximated using deep neural networks. We call this threat model the neural perceptual threat model (NPTM); it includes adversarial examples with a bounded neural perceptual distance (a neural network-based approximation of the true perceptual distance) to natural images. Through an extensive perceptual study, we show that the neural perceptual distance correlates well with human judgements of perceptibility of adversarial examples, validating our threat model. Under the NPTM, we develop novel perceptual adversarial attacks and defenses. Because the NPTM is very broad, we find that Perceptual Adversarial Training (PAT) against a perceptual attack gives robustness against many other types of adversarial attacks. We test PAT on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet-100 against five diverse adversarial attacks. We find that PAT achieves state-of-the-art robustness against the union of these five attacks, more than doubling the accuracy over the next best model, without training against any of them. That is, PAT generalizes well to unforeseen perturbation types. This is vital in sensitive applications where a particular threat model cannot be assumed, and to the best of our knowledge, PAT is the first adversarial training defense with this property.

Key facts. Cited by 137 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 23; 2022: 32; 2023: 32; 2024: 20; 2025: 22; 2026: 8.

137 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 469
  2. 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 434
  3. 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
  4. 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
  5. 2023Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry by Text-to-Image Modelscited by 200
  6. 2024Robust Prompt Optimization for Defending Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 150
  7. 2021Model-Based Domain Generalizationcited by 103
  8. 2021LowKey: Leveraging Adversarial Attacks to Protect Social Media Users from Facial Recognitioncited by 92
  9. 2024Defending Against Unforeseen Failure Modes with Latent Adversarial Trainingcited by 82
  10. 2023Revisiting Adversarial Training for ImageNet: Architectures, Training and Generalization across Threat Modelscited by 79
  11. 2023Robust Classification via a Single Diffusion Modelcited by 79
  12. 2022Frequency-driven Imperceptible Adversarial Attack on Semantic Similaritycited by 76
38 more
  1. 2023Black Box Adversarial Prompting for Foundation Modelscited by 62
  2. 2022Discovering Bugs in Vision Models using Off-the-shelf Image Generation and Captioningcited by 45
  3. 2023Shared Adversarial Unlearning: Backdoor Mitigation by Unlearning Shared Adversarial Examplescited by 40
  4. 2023Image Shortcut Squeezing: Countering Perturbative Availability Poisons with Compressioncited by 39
  5. 2023IMPRESS: Evaluating the Resilience of Imperceptible Perturbations Against Unauthorized Data Usage in Diffusion-Based Generative AIcited by 32
  6. 2022Sparse Visual Counterfactual Explanations in Image Spacecited by 30
  7. 2022Perceptual Attacks of No-Reference Image Quality Models with Human-in-the-Loopcited by 30
  8. 2021Low Curvature Activations Reduce Overfitting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 29
  9. 2021Defending Against Image Corruptions Through Adversarial Augmentationscited by 28
  10. 2023R-LPIPS: An Adversarially Robust Perceptual Similarity Metriccited by 27
  11. 2022Towards Compositional Adversarial Robustness: Generalizing Adversarial Training to Composite Semantic Perturbationscited by 26
  12. 2023CUDA: Convolution-based Unlearnable Datasetscited by 26
  13. 2021Adversarially Robust Learning with Unknown Perturbation Setscited by 24
  14. 2022Threat Model-Agnostic Adversarial Defense using Diffusion Modelscited by 24
  15. 2024ADBM: Adversarial diffusion bridge model for reliable adversarial purificationcited by 24
  16. 2021Adversarial Robustness against Multiple and Single lp-Threat Models via Quick Fine-Tuning of Robust Classifierscited by 23
  17. 2021Unrestricted Adversarial Attacks on ImageNet Competitioncited by 23
  18. 2022Exploring the Relationship between Architecture and Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 23
  19. 2024Adversarial Attacks of Vision Tasks in the Past 10 Years: A Surveycited by 22
  20. 2023Generative Watermarking Against Unauthorized Subject-Driven Image Synthesiscited by 21
  21. 2021Robustness and Generalization via Generative Adversarial Trainingcited by 20
  22. 2022Explicit Tradeoffs between Adversarial and Natural Distributional Robustnesscited by 20
  23. 2022Scaling Adversarial Training to Large Perturbation Boundscited by 20
  24. 2023Detecting Adversarial Data by Probing Multiple Perturbations Using Expected Perturbation Scorecited by 20
  25. 2024Speech Robust Bench: A Robustness Benchmark For Speech Recognitioncited by 20
  26. 2022PRoA: A Probabilistic Robustness Assessment against Functional Perturbationscited by 19
  27. 2023Towards Benchmarking and Assessing Visual Naturalness of Physical World Adversarial Attackscited by 18
  28. 2021Mutual Adversarial Training: Learning together is better than going alonecited by 17
  29. 2023Unlearnable Examples Give a False Sense of Security: Piercing through Unexploitable Data with Learnable Examplescited by 17
  30. 2023Instruct2Attack: Language-Guided Semantic Adversarial Attackscited by 16
  31. 2022On the Effectiveness of Adversarial Training against Backdoor Attackscited by 15
  32. 2024Adversarial Training on Purification (AToP): Advancing Both Robustness and Generalizationcited by 15
  33. 2022Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Data through Cost and Utility Awarenesscited by 14
  34. 2022Towards Transferable Unrestricted Adversarial Examples with Minimum Changescited by 13
  35. 2023Adversarial Training Should Be Cast as a Non-Zero-Sum Gamecited by 13
  36. 2022Why adversarial training can hurt robust accuracycited by 12
  37. 2023Towards Reliable Evaluation and Fast Training of Robust Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 12
  38. 2021Sample Efficient Detection and Classification of Adversarial Attacks via Self-Supervised Embeddingscited by 11

50 most cited of 137 All 137 (JSON)