mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CLIP Behaves like a Bag-of-Words Model Cross-modally but not Uni-modally

arXiv 2502.03566 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 30

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining) has become a popular choice for various downstream tasks. However, recent studies have questioned its ability to represent compositional concepts effectively. These works suggest that CLIP often acts like a bag-of-words (BoW) model, interpreting images and text as sets of individual concepts without grasping the structural relationships. In particular, CLIP struggles to correctly bind attributes to their corresponding objects when multiple objects are present in an image or text. In this work, we investigate why CLIP exhibits this BoW-like behavior. Our key finding is that CLIP does not lack binding information. Through linear probing, robustness tests with increasing object counts, and conjunctive search experiments, we show that attribute-object bindings are already encoded within CLIP's text and image embeddings. The weakness lies in the cross-modal alignment, which fails to preserve this information. We show it can be accessed cross-modally with a simple linear transformation to text embeddings. This improves CLIP's attribute-object binding performance and confirms that the information was already encoded unimodally. In practice, this means CLIP-based systems can be enhanced with a lightweight linear layer trained on existing embeddings, avoiding costly encoder retraining. The code is available at https://github.com/kdariina/CLIP-not-BoW-unimodally.

Key facts. Cited by 30 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2025.

Builds on

38 of 43 references.

References · 38

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  4. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  5. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  6. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  7. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 719
  8. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
  9. 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
  10. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
  11. 2022Visual Spatial Reasoningcited by 288
  12. 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 264
26 more
  1. 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoningcited by 245
  2. 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 238
  3. 2020On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 230
  4. 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Tencited by 194
  5. 2022CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?cited by 177
  6. 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 116
  7. 2022VL-CheckList: Evaluating Pre-trained Vision-Language Models with Objects, Attributes and Relationscited by 113
  8. 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 101
  9. 2024Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problemcited by 71
  10. 2025Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negationcited by 69
  11. 2024The Neglected Tails in Vision-Language Modelscited by 63
  12. 2024TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negativescited by 57
  13. 2023COLA: A Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-image Retrievalcited by 53
  14. 2023Mass-Producing Failures of Multimodal Systems with Language Modelscited by 36
  15. 2023Text encoders bottleneck compositionality in contrastive vision-language modelscited by 34
  16. 2022Do Vision-Language Pretrained Models Learn Composable Primitive Concepts?cited by 31
  17. 2023PUG: Photorealistic and Semantically Controllable Synthetic Data for Representation Learningcited by 31
  18. 2023Prompting Language-Informed Distribution for Compositional Zero-Shot Learningcited by 24
  19. 2022When are Lemons Purple? The Concept Association Bias of Vision-Language Modelscited by 23
  20. 2024VisMin: Visual Minimal-Change Understandingcited by 23
  21. 2024The Hard Positive Truth about Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 21
  22. 2024Improving Compositional Attribute Binding in Text-to-Image Generative Models via Enhanced Text Embeddingscited by 18
  23. 2024Preserving Multi-Modal Capabilities of Pre-trained VLMs for Improving Vision-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 17
  24. 2024If CLIP Could Talk: Understanding Vision-Language Model Representations Through Their Preferred Concept Descriptionscited by 14
  25. 2024Deciphering the Role of Representation Disentanglement: Investigating Compositional Generalization in CLIP Modelscited by 13
  26. 2024Object-Attribute Binding in Text-to-Image Generation: Evaluation and Controlcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 13; 2026: 17.

30 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025A Survey of Multimodal Hallucination Evaluation and Detectioncited by 26
  2. 2025Does Data Scaling Lead to Visual Compositional Generalization?cited by 13
  3. 2025Diffusion Classifiers Understand Compositionality, but Conditions Applycited by 7
  4. 2025Noise Matters: Optimizing Matching Noise for Diffusion Classifierscited by 7
  5. 2025A Good CREPE needs more than just Sugar: Investigating Biases in Compositional Vision-Language Benchmarkscited by 5
  6. 2026Not Just What's There: Enabling CLIP to Comprehend Negated Visual Descriptions Without Fine-tuningcited by 5
  7. 2025On the rankability of visual embeddingscited by 4
  8. 2025Common Data Properties Limit Object-Attribute Binding in CLIPcited by 4
  9. 2025VisRet: Visualization Improves Knowledge-Intensive Text-to-Image Retrievalcited by 3
  10. 2026Still Between Us? Evaluating and Improving Voice Assistant Robustness to Third-Party Interruptionscited by 3
  11. 2025DeLeaker: Dynamic Inference-Time Reweighting For Semantic Leakage Mitigation in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 2
  12. 2025RLM: A Vision-Language Model Approach for Radar Scene Understandingcited by 2
18 more
  1. 2025ABE-CLIP: Training-Free Attribute Binding Enhancement for Compositional Image-Text Matchingcited by 2
  2. 2026Similarity Is Not Logic: Factored Inference for Dual-Encoder Vision-Language Modelscited by 2
  3. 2025Evaluating Attribute Confusion in Fashion Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1
  4. 2026When Negation Is a Geometry Problem in Vision-Language Modelscited by 1
  5. 2026Latent Goal Prediction from Language for Model-Based Planningcited by 1
  6. 2025Perceptual Reality Transformer: What Must an Illustration Preserve?cited by 0
  7. 2026Half-Truths Break Similarity-Based Retrievalcited by 0
  8. 2026Is CLIP Cross-Eyed? Revealing and Mitigating Center Bias in the CLIP Familycited by 0
  9. 2026Concrete Jungle: Towards Concreteness Paved Contrastive Negative Mining for Compositional Understandingcited by 0
  10. 2026OccDirector: Language-Guided Behavior and Interaction Generation in 4D Occupancy Spacecited by 0
  11. 2026How can embedding models bind concepts?cited by 0
  12. 2026Formalizing the Binding Problemcited by 0
  13. 2026Foveated Probes Recover Localized Binding Information in Vision Foundation Modelscited by 0
  14. 2026HEAR Who Said What: Unlocking Speaker-Attributed Reasoning via Counterfactual Voice Groundingcited by 0
  15. 2026FRAME: Factored Retrieval via Attribute Readouts for Object-Centric Scene Memorycited by 0
  16. 2026BindCLIP: One Balanced Coupling For Compositional Vision Language Scoringcited by 0
  17. 2026Don't CLAP: Are Music-Text Models Bag-of-Words?cited by 0
  18. 2026Seeing Is Not Addressing: Auditing Linguistic Access to Frozen Visual Geometrycited by 0