mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating Attribute Confusion in Fashion Text-to-Image Generation

arXiv 2507.07079 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the rapid advances in Text-to-Image (T2I) generation models, their evaluation remains challenging in domains like fashion, involving complex compositional generation. Recent automated T2I evaluation methods leverage pre-trained vision-language models to measure cross-modal alignment. However, our preliminary study reveals that they are still limited in assessing rich entity-attribute semantics, facing challenges in attribute confusion, i.e., when attributes are correctly depicted but associated to the wrong entities. To address this, we build on a Visual Question Answering (VQA) localization strategy targeting one single entity at a time across both visual and textual modalities. We propose a localized human evaluation protocol and introduce a novel automatic metric, Localized VQAScore (L-VQAScore), that combines visual localization with VQA probing both correct (reflection) and miss-localized (leakage) attribute generation. On a newly curated dataset featuring challenging compositional alignment scenarios, L-VQAScore outperforms state-of-the-art T2I evaluation methods in terms of correlation with human judgments, demonstrating its strength in capturing fine-grained entity-attribute associations. We believe L-VQAScore can be a reliable and scalable alternative to subjective evaluations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2025.

Builds on

29 of 33 references.

References · 29

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  4. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
  5. 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,847
  6. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  7. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
  8. 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
  9. 2021GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 3,614
  10. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,876
  11. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
  12. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
17 more
  1. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,045
  2. 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 977
  3. 2024Grounded SAM: Assembling Open-World Models for Diverse Visual Taskscited by 929
  4. 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 890
  5. 2023Attend-and-Excite: Attention-Based Semantic Guidance for Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 702
  6. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
  7. 2022Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Mask-adapted CLIPcited by 565
  8. 2024Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generationcited by 474
  9. 2022Training-Free Structured Diffusion Guidance for Compositional Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 388
  10. 2022CogView2: Faster and Better Text-to-Image Generation via Hierarchical Transformerscited by 307
  11. 2023VIEScore: Towards Explainable Metrics for Conditional Image Synthesis Evaluationcited by 201
  12. 2023Davidsonian Scene Graph: Improving Reliability in Fine-grained Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 171
  13. 2023What You See is What You Read? Improving Text-Image Alignment Evaluationcited by 108
  14. 2021The Perils of Using Mechanical Turk to Evaluate Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 97
  15. 2023Toward Verifiable and Reproducible Human Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 68
  16. 2020Fashionpedia: Ontology, Segmentation, and an Attribute Localization Datasetcited by 57
  17. 2025CLIP Behaves like a Bag-of-Words Model Cross-modally but not Uni-modallycited by 31

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024GenAI-Bench: Evaluating and Improving Compositional Text-to-Visual Generation
  2. 2025Vision-Language Models Struggle to Align Entities across Modalities
  3. 2026FIRE-CIR: Fine-grained Reasoning for Composed Fashion Image Retrieval
  4. 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Visual Question Answering Datasets and Algorithms
  5. 2024Evaluating Attribute Comprehension in Large Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Towards Flexible Evaluation for Generative Visual Question Answering
  7. 2024Cross-Lingual Text-Rich Visual Comprehension: An Information Theory Perspective
  8. 2024Continuous, Subject-Specific Attribute Control in T2I Models by Identifying Semantic Directions