On the rankability of visual embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study whether visual embedding models capture continuous, ordinal attributes along linear directions, which we term _rank axes_. We define a model as _rankable_ for an attribute if projecting embeddings onto such an axis preserves the attribute's order. Across 7 popular encoders and 9 datasets with attributes like age, crowd count, head pose, aesthetics, and recency, we find that many embeddings are inherently rankable. Surprisingly, a small number of samples, or even just two extreme examples, often suffice to recover meaningful rank axes, without full-scale supervision. These findings open up new use cases for image ranking in vector databases and motivate further study into the structure and learning of rankable embeddings. Our code is available at https://github.com/aktsonthalia/rankable-vision-embeddings.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2025.
Builds on
55 of 76 references.
References · 55
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
- 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
38 more
- 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,098
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
- 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
- 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 712
- 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 627
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
- 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 559
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
- 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
- 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
- 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 321
- 2019Hyperbolic Image Embeddingscited by 221
- 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Tencited by 198
- 2018Composition Loss for Counting, Density Map Estimation and Localization in Dense Crowdscited by 186
- 2023Linear Representations of Sentiment in Large Language Modelscited by 163
- 2023Hyperbolic Image-Text Representationscited by 136
- 2015Order-Embeddings of Images and Languagecited by 113
- 2022Disentangled Representation Learningcited by 112
- 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 102
- 2023CLIP-Count: Towards Text-Guided Zero-Shot Object Countingcited by 83
- 2022Rank-N-Contrast: Learning Continuous Representations for Regressioncited by 76
- 2021Deep Learning for Instance Retrieval: A Surveycited by 70
- 2024LP++: A Surprisingly Strong Linear Probe for Few-Shot CLIPcited by 60
- 2023Linear Spaces of Meanings: Compositional Structures in Vision-Language Modelscited by 48
- 2023CrowdCLIP: Unsupervised Crowd Counting via Vision-Language Modelcited by 47
- 2022OrdinalCLIP: Learning Rank Prompts for Language-Guided Ordinal Regressioncited by 44
- 2017Heterogeneous Face Attribute Estimation: A Deep Multi-Task Learning Approachcited by 43
- 2023MiVOLO: Multi-input Transformer for Age and Gender Estimationcited by 42
- 2024The Double-Ellipsoid Geometry of CLIPcited by 42
- 2024FaceXFormer: A Unified Transformer for Facial Analysiscited by 34
- 2025CLIP Behaves like a Bag-of-Words Model Cross-modally but not Uni-modallycited by 31
- 2024It's Not a Modality Gap: Characterizing and Addressing the Contrastive Gapcited by 26
- 2022Beyond a Pre-Trained Object Detector: Cross-Modal Textual and Visual Context for Image Captioningcited by 25
- 2023Learning-to-Rank Meets Language: Boosting Language-Driven Ordering Alignment for Ordinal Classificationcited by 21
- 2024Teach CLIP to Develop a Number Sense for Ordinal Regressioncited by 20
- 2025Intermediate Layer Classifiers for OOD generalizationcited by 14
- 2024CLIP-EBC: CLIP Can Count Accurately through Enhanced Blockwise Classificationcited by 12
- 2023Parts of Speech-Grounded Subspaces in Vision-Language Modelscited by 11
50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Does Data Scaling Lead to Visual Compositional Generalization?cited by 13
- 2026CLAY: Conditional Visual Similarity Modulation in Vision-Language Embedding Spacecited by 1
- 2026Semantic Robustness Certification for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Seeing Is Not Addressing: Auditing Linguistic Access to Frozen Visual Geometrycited by 0
- 2026Seeing Is Not Addressing: Auditing Linguistic Access to Frozen Visual Geometry29 Sep 2026
- 2026Semantic Robustness Certification for Vision-Language Models17 Jun 2026
- 2026CLAY: Conditional Visual Similarity Modulation in Vision-Language Embedding Space13 Apr 2026
- 2025Does Data Scaling Lead to Visual Compositional Generalization?9 Jul 2025