Noise Matters: Optimizing Matching Noise for Diffusion Classifiers
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP
Abstract (arXiv)
Although today's pretrained discriminative vision-language models (e.g., CLIP) have demonstrated strong perception abilities, such as zero-shot image classification, they also suffer from the bag-of-words problem and spurious bias. To mitigate these problems, some pioneering studies leverage powerful generative models (e.g., pretrained diffusion models) to realize generalizable image classification, dubbed Diffusion Classifier (DC). Specifically, by randomly sampling a Gaussian noise, DC utilizes the differences of denoising effects with different category conditions to classify categories. Unfortunately, an inherent and notorious weakness of existing DCs is noise instability: different random sampled noises lead to significant performance changes. To achieve stable classification performance, existing DCs always ensemble the results of hundreds of sampled noises, which significantly reduces the classification speed. To this end, we firstly explore the role of noise in DC, and conclude that: there are some ``good noises'' that can relieve the instability. Meanwhile, we argue that these good noises should meet two principles: Frequency Matching and Spatial Matching. Regarding both principles, we propose a novel Noise Optimization method to learn matching (i.e., good) noise for DCs: NoOp. For frequency matching, NoOp first optimizes a dataset-specific noise: Given a dataset and a timestep t, optimize one randomly initialized parameterized noise. For Spatial Matching, NoOp trains a Meta-Network that adopts an image as input and outputs image-specific noise offset. The sum of optimized noise and noise offset will be used in DC to replace random noise. Extensive ablations on various datasets demonstrated the effectiveness of NoOp.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 45 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2025.
Builds on
45 of 57 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?4 Oct
- 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep
Other references · 42
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2023Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 5,503
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
- 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,255
30 more
- 2022An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversioncited by 2,245
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
- 2023Open-Vocabulary Panoptic Segmentation with Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 375
- 2022DiffusionDet: Diffusion Model for Object Detectioncited by 354
- 2023Repurposing Diffusion-Based Image Generators for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 327
- 2024MACE: Mass Concept Erasure in Diffusion Modelscited by 307
- 2023Your Diffusion Model is Secretly a Zero-Shot Classifiercited by 306
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2021Global Filter Networks for Image Classificationcited by 260
- 2023TF-ICON: Diffusion-Based Training-Free Cross-Domain Image Compositioncited by 182
- 2024Semantic Image Inversion and Editing using Rectified Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 165
- 2023Text-to-Image Diffusion Models are Zero-Shot Classifierscited by 143
- 2024InitNO: Boosting Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Initial Noise Optimizationcited by 123
- 2024Robust Watermarking Using Generative Priors Against Image Editing: From Benchmarking to Advancescited by 110
- 2024Golden Noise for Diffusion Models: A Learning Frameworkcited by 92
- 2023Generating images of rare concepts using pre-trained diffusion modelscited by 79
- 2023Robust Classification via a Single Diffusion Modelcited by 79
- 2024Not All Noises Are Created Equally:Diffusion Noise Selection and Optimizationcited by 71
- 2024Zigzag Diffusion Sampling: Diffusion Models Can Self-Improve via Self-Reflectioncited by 41
- 2024All Seeds Are Not Equal: Enhancing Compositional Text-to-Image Generation with Reliable Random Seedscited by 31
- 2025CLIP Behaves like a Bag-of-Words Model Cross-modally but not Uni-modallycited by 31
- 2023What do neural networks learn in image classification? A frequency shortcut perspectivecited by 28
- 2022Deep Fourier Up-Samplingcited by 27
- 2024FIND: Fine-tuning Initial Noise Distribution with Policy Optimization for Diffusion Modelscited by 20
- 2025Weak-to-Strong Diffusion with Reflectioncited by 13
- 2024Few-shot Learner Parameterization by Diffusion Time-stepscited by 11
- 2022Investigating and Explaining the Frequency Bias in Image Classificationcited by 8
- 2024A Simple and Efficient Baseline for Zero-Shot Generative Classificationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2025Does FLUX Already Know How to Perform Physically Plausible Image Composition?cited by 32
- 2025DragFlow: Unleashing DiT Priors with Region Based Supervision for Drag Editingcited by 29
- 2026FlowComposer: Composable Flows for Compositional Zero-Shot Learningcited by 3
- 2026FlowCIR: Semantic Transport via Flow Matching for Zero-Shot Composed Image Retrievalcited by 2
- 2026Revisiting Autoregressive Models for Generative Image Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Self-Improving Diffusion Classifiers with Minority Preference Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026How Do Diffusion Classifiers Decide? A Bias-Centric Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026How Do Diffusion Classifiers Decide? A Bias-Centric Evaluation4 Jul 2026
- 2026Self-Improving Diffusion Classifiers with Minority Preference Optimization4 Jul 2026
- 2026FlowCIR: Semantic Transport via Flow Matching for Zero-Shot Composed Image Retrieval2 Jul 2026
- 2026Revisiting Autoregressive Models for Generative Image Classification19 Mar 2026
- 2026FlowComposer: Composable Flows for Compositional Zero-Shot Learning17 Mar 2026
- 2025DragFlow: Unleashing DiT Priors with Region Based Supervision for Drag Editing2 Oct 2025
- 2025Does FLUX Already Know How to Perform Physically Plausible Image Composition?25 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Diffusion Noise Feature: Accurate and Fast Generated Image Detection
- 2022Perception Prioritized Training of Diffusion Models
- 2025Guiding Noisy Label Conditional Diffusion Models with Score-based Discriminator Correction
- 2024CleanDIFT: Diffusion Features without Noise
- 2024Improved Noise Schedule for Diffusion Training
- 2025Diffusion Classifiers Understand Compositionality, but Conditions Apply
- 2025Denoising Score Matching with Random Features: Insights on Diffusion Models from Precise Learning Curves
- 2026Class-frequency Guided Noise Schedule for Diffusion Models