mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When Negation Is a Geometry Problem in Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2603.20554 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Joint Vision-Language Embedding models such as CLIP typically fail at understanding negation in text queries, for example, failing to distinguish "no" in the query: "a plain blue shirt with no logos". Prior work has largely addressed this limitation through data-centric approaches, fine-tuning CLIP on large-scale synthetic negation datasets. However, these efforts are commonly evaluated using retrieval-based metrics that cannot reliably reflect whether negation is actually understood. In this paper, we identify two key limitations of such evaluation metrics and investigate an alternative evaluation framework based on Multimodal LLMs-as-a-judge, which typically excel at understanding simple yes/no questions about image content, providing a fair evaluation of negation understanding in CLIP models. We then ask whether there already exists a direction in the CLIP embedding space associated with negation. We find evidence that such a direction exists, and show that it can be manipulated through test-time intervention via representation engineering to steer CLIP toward negation-aware behavior without any fine-tuning. Finally, we test negation understanding on non-common image-text samples to evaluate generalization under distribution shifts. Code is at https://github.com/fawazsammani/negation-steering

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 23 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2026.

Builds on

23 of 26 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negation16 Jan
  2. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?4 Oct

Other references · 21

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  5. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
  6. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  7. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
  8. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
  9. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  10. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  11. 2023Otter: A Multi-Modal Model with In-Context Instruction Tuningcited by 548
  12. 2021Image Segmentation Using Text and Image Promptscited by 509
9 more
  1. 2023Scaling Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 335
  2. 2022Simple Open-Vocabulary Object Detection with Vision Transformerscited by 303
  3. 2022ECCV Caption: Correcting False Negatives by Collecting Machine-and-Human-verified Image-Caption Associations for MS-COCOcited by 37
  4. 2025CLIP Behaves like a Bag-of-Words Model Cross-modally but not Uni-modallycited by 30
  5. 2025Know "No" Better: A Data-Driven Approach for Enhancing Negation Awareness in CLIPcited by 26
  6. 2025Is CLIP ideal? No. Can we fix it? Yes!cited by 20
  7. 2024How and where does CLIP process negation?cited by 16
  8. 2024Toward Interactive Regional Understanding in Vision-Large Language Modelscited by 9
  9. 2025Cyclic Contrastive Knowledge Transfer for Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Learn "No" to Say "Yes" Better: Improving Vision-Language Models via Negations
  2. 2026Not Just What's There: Enabling CLIP to Comprehend Negated Visual Descriptions Without Fine-tuning
  3. 2025TNG-CLIP:Training-Time Negation Data Generation for Negation Awareness of CLIP
  4. 2026Omni-NegCLIP: Enhancing CLIP with Front-Layer Contrastive Fine-Tuning for Comprehensive Negation Understanding
  5. 2025SpaceVLM: Sub-Space Modeling of Negation in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026HANCLIP: A Family of Hyperbolic Angular Negation Vision Language Models
  7. 2026What CLIP Knows but Cannot Say: Recovering Negation from Frozen Intermediate Features
  8. 2025Contrastive vision-language learning with paraphrasing and negation