Formalizing the Binding Problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Representations of the world, arguably, contain information about features (e.g. something is blue, something is a circle) but also information about which features are part of the same object (e.g. the circle is blue), which we call binding information. Any system with the ability to understand scenes with multiple objects must be able to solve the binding problem: it needs to know which features belong together. However, despite work showing that Vision Transformers (ViTs) know which patches belong together, it is not known whether current deep learning models learn to exhibit binding information, i.e., for features. We may believe that there is not much binding information, after all misattributing features to wrong objects is a common failure of ViT-based architectures, especially in scenes with objects sharing features. Here we formalize the binding problem with an information-theoretic approach, and introduce a probing method to measure binding information in model representations. We perform experiments on ViTs, measuring binding from different components of the architecture, such as the image summary token [CLS] or the spatial tokens. We use datasets with different binding challenges, such as feature sharing, occlusion, and natural features, while comparing the performance of several pre-trained ViTs. Overall, our research demonstrates binding as a key ingredient to strong visual recognition and reasoning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
39 of 67 references.
References · 39
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
- 2025DINOv3cited by 1,414
- 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them Allcited by 1,175
- 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 903
- 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 876
- 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 809
- 2017Dynamic Routing Between Capsulescited by 689
27 more
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
- 2019MONet: Unsupervised Scene Decomposition and Representationcited by 392
- 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 376
- 2019Multi-Object Representation Learning with Iterative Variational Inferencecited by 360
- 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 265
- 2020On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 233
- 2022Bridging the Gap to Real-World Object-Centric Learningcited by 220
- 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 102
- 2021ClevrTex: A Texture-Rich Benchmark for Unsupervised Multi-Object Segmentationcited by 93
- 2023Compositional Abilities Emerge Multiplicatively: Exploring Diffusion Models on a Synthetic Taskcited by 93
- 2024Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problemcited by 75
- 2023Self-supervised Object-Centric Learning for Videoscited by 49
- 2024Artificial Kuramoto Oscillatory Neuronscited by 38
- 2024Token Merging for Training-Free Semantic Binding in Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 35
- 2025CLIP Behaves like a Bag-of-Words Model Cross-modally but not Uni-modallycited by 31
- 2024How Far Are We from Intelligent Visual Deductive Reasoning?cited by 29
- 2025How Do Transformers Learn Variable Binding in Symbolic Programs?cited by 21
- 2024FineCops-Ref: A new Dataset and Task for Fine-Grained Compositional Referring Expression Comprehensioncited by 20
- 2025Does Object Binding Naturally Emerge in Large Pretrained Vision Transformers?cited by 19
- 2025Visual symbolic mechanisms: Emergent symbol processing in vision language modelscited by 13
- 2025Does Data Scaling Lead to Visual Compositional Generalization?cited by 13
- 2025Object-centric Binding in Contrastive Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 12
- 2025Are We Done with Object-Centric Learning?cited by 11
- 2024Recurrent Complex-Weighted Autoencoders for Unsupervised Object Discoverycited by 8
- 2025Geometrical Properties of Text Token Embeddings for Strong Semantic Binding in Text-to-Image Generationcited by 5
- 2025Evaluating Compositional Generalisation in VLMs and Diffusion Modelscited by 5
- 2024Visual Reasoning in Object-Centric Deep Neural Networks: A Comparative Cognition Approachcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.