mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Misspellings in Natural Language Processing: A survey

arXiv 2501.16836 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This survey provides an overview of the challenges of misspellings in natural language processing (NLP). While often unintentional, misspellings have become ubiquitous in digital communication, especially with the proliferation of Web 2.0, user-generated content, and informal text mediums such as social media, blogs, and forums. Even if humans can generally interpret misspelled text, NLP models frequently struggle to handle it: this causes a decline in performance in common tasks like text classification and machine translation. In this paper, we reconstruct a history of misspellings as a scientific problem. We then discuss the latest advancements to address the challenge of misspellings in NLP. Main strategies to mitigate the effect of misspellings include data augmentation, double step, character-order agnostic, and tuple-based methods, among others. This survey also examines dedicated data challenges and competitions to spur progress in the field. Critical safety and ethical concerns are also examined, for example, the voluntary use of misspellings to inject malicious messages and hate speech on social networks. Furthermore, the survey explores psycholinguistic perspectives on how humans process misspellings, potentially informing innovative computational techniques for text normalization and representation. Finally, the misspelling-related challenges and opportunities associated with modern large language models are also analyzed, including benchmarks, datasets, and performances of the most prominent language models against misspellings. This survey aims to be an exhaustive resource for researchers seeking to mitigate the impact of misspellings in the rapidly evolving landscape of NLP.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 61 of its 117 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2025.

Builds on

61 of 117 references.

References · 61

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  5. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  6. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  7. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  8. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
  9. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  10. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  11. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 869
  12. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
38 more
  1. 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 376
  2. 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 304
  3. 2021Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 227
  4. 2023PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Promptscited by 218
  5. 2020HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 215
  6. 2016A Decomposable Attention Model for Natural Language Inferencecited by 214
  7. 2018Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inferencecited by 211
  8. 2023On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspectivecited by 208
  9. 2016Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inferencecited by 199
  10. 2019Combating Adversarial Misspellings with Robust Word Recognitioncited by 162
  11. 2019Robust Neural Machine Translation with Doubly Adversarial Inputscited by 105
  12. 2017Deceiving Google's Perspective API Built for Detecting Toxic Commentscited by 99
  13. 2017JFLEG: A Fluency Corpus and Benchmark for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 96
  14. 2021Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Language Models to Input Perturbationscited by 87
  15. 2020Robust Encodings: A Framework for Combating Adversarial Typoscited by 58
  16. 2019On Evaluation of Adversarial Perturbations for Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 56
  17. 2018MTNT: A Testbed for Machine Translation of Noisy Textcited by 54
  18. 2022Language Modelling with Pixelscited by 53
  19. 2019Training on Synthetic Noise Improves Robustness to Natural Noise in Machine Translationcited by 52
  20. 2021Robust Open-Vocabulary Translation from Visual Text Representationscited by 47
  21. 2019Inoculation by Fine-Tuning: A Method for Analyzing Challenge Datasetscited by 41
  22. 2019Improving Robustness of Machine Translation with Synthetic Noisecited by 36
  23. 2016What to do about non-standard (or non-canonical) language in NLPcited by 35
  24. 2018WikiAtomicEdits: A Multilingual Corpus of Wikipedia Edits for Modeling Language and Discoursecited by 26
  25. 2021NoiseQA: Challenge Set Evaluation for User-Centric Question Answeringcited by 25
  26. 2017How Robust Are Character-Based Word Embeddings in Tagging and MT Against Wrod Scramlbing or Randdm Nouse?cited by 23
  27. 2022Analysing the Robustness of Dual Encoders for Dense Retrieval Against Misspellingscited by 23
  28. 2019GitHub Typo Corpus: A Large-Scale Multilingual Dataset of Misspellings and Grammatical Errorscited by 22
  29. 2019Towards Robust Toxic Content Classificationcited by 22
  30. 2019Misspelling Oblivious Word Embeddingscited by 19
  31. 2016Robsut Wrod Reocginiton via semi-Character Recurrent Neural Networkcited by 18
  32. 2019Findings of the First Shared Task on Machine Translation Robustnesscited by 17
  33. 2020NAT: Noise-Aware Training for Robust Neural Sequence Labelingcited by 17
  34. 2017JESC: Japanese-English Subtitle Corpuscited by 16
  35. 2019Improving Neural Machine Translation Robustness via Data Augmentation: Beyond Back Translationcited by 16
  36. 2020Word Shape Matters: Robust Machine Translation with Visual Embeddingcited by 12
  37. 2022Imputing Out-of-Vocabulary Embeddings with LOVE Makes Language Models Robust with Little Costcited by 9
  38. 2021Understanding Model Robustness to User-generated Noisy Textscited by 8

50 most cited of 61 All 61 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.