mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Model Robustness to User-generated Noisy Texts

arXiv 2110.07428 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2021cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sensitivity of deep-neural models to input noise is known to be a challenging problem. In NLP, model performance often deteriorates with naturally occurring noise, such as spelling errors. To mitigate this issue, models may leverage artificially noised data. However, the amount and type of generated noise has so far been determined arbitrarily. We therefore propose to model the errors statistically from grammatical-error-correction corpora. We present a thorough evaluation of several state-of-the-art NLP systems' robustness in multiple languages, with tasks including morpho-syntactic analysis, named entity recognition, neural machine translation, a subset of the GLUE benchmark and reading comprehension. We also compare two approaches to address the performance drop: a) training the NLP models with noised data generated by our framework; and b) reducing the input noise with external system for natural language correction. The code is released at https://github.com/ufal/kazitext.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2021.

Builds on

20 of 41 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  4. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  5. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  6. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  7. 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 304
  8. 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
  9. 2019Neural Architectures for Nested NER through Linearizationcited by 56
  10. 2018MTNT: A Testbed for Machine Translation of Noisy Textcited by 54
  11. 2019Grammatical Error Correction in Low-Resource Scenarioscited by 28
  12. 2019A Neural Grammatical Error Correction System Built On Better Pre-training and Sequential Transfer Learningcited by 26
8 more
  1. 2017How Robust Are Character-Based Word Embeddings in Tagging and MT Against Wrod Scramlbing or Randdm Nouse?cited by 23
  2. 2018Reaching Human-level Performance in Automatic Grammatical Error Correction: An Empirical Studycited by 22
  3. 2019Findings of the First Shared Task on Machine Translation Robustnesscited by 17
  4. 2020Announcing CzEng 2.0 Parallel Corpus with over 2 Gigawordscited by 17
  5. 2017Artificial Error Generation with Machine Translation and Syntactic Patternscited by 11
  6. 2018Wronging a Right: Generating Better Errors to Improve Grammatical Error Detectioncited by 11
  7. 2019Evaluating Contextualized Embeddings on 54 Languages in POS Tagging, Lemmatization and Dependency Parsingcited by 8
  8. 2020Reading Comprehension in Czech via Machine Translation and Cross-lingual Transfercited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

8 papers.