mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards an End-to-End (E2E) Adversarial Learning and Application in the Physical World

arXiv 2501.08258 ↗First posted 14 Jan 2025cs.CV cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The traditional learning process of patch-based adversarial attacks, conducted in the digital domain and then applied in the physical domain (e.g., via printed stickers), may suffer from reduced performance due to adversarial patches' limited transferability from the digital domain to the physical domain. Given that previous studies have considered using projectors to apply adversarial attacks, we raise the following question: can adversarial learning (i.e., patch generation) be performed entirely in the physical domain with a projector? In this work, we propose the Physical-domain Adversarial Patch Learning Augmentation (PAPLA) framework, a novel end-to-end (E2E) framework that converts adversarial learning from the digital domain to the physical domain using a projector. We evaluate PAPLA across multiple scenarios, including controlled laboratory settings and realistic outdoor environments, demonstrating its ability to ensure attack success compared to conventional digital learning-physical application (DL-PA) methods. We also analyze the impact of environmental factors, such as projection surface color, projector strength, ambient light, distance, and angle of the target object relative to the camera, on the effectiveness of projected patches. Finally, we demonstrate the feasibility of the attack against a parked car and a stop sign in a real-world outdoor environment. Our results show that under specific conditions, E2E adversarial learning in the physical domain eliminates the transferability issue and ensures evasion by object detectors. Finally, we provide insights into the challenges and opportunities of applying adversarial learning in the physical domain and explain where such an approach is more effective than using a sticker.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2025.

Builds on

38 of 66 references.

References · 38

  1. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  2. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  3. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  4. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
  5. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 459
  6. 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 328
  7. 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
  8. 2019Simple Black-box Adversarial Attackscited by 249
  9. 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 214
  10. 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
  11. 2019AdvHat: Real-world adversarial attack on ArcFace Face ID systemcited by 161
  12. 2018ShapeShifter: Robust Physical Adversarial Attack on Faster R-CNN Object Detectorcited by 159
26 more
  1. 2019Making an Invisibility Cloak: Real World Adversarial Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 155
  2. 2018SentiNet: Detecting Localized Universal Attacks Against Deep Learning Systemscited by 148
  3. 2018DPatch: An Adversarial Patch Attack on Object Detectorscited by 146
  4. 2022Adversarial Texture for Fooling Person Detectors in the Physical Worldcited by 96
  5. 2021Adv-Makeup: A New Imperceptible and Transferable Attack on Face Recognitioncited by 95
  6. 2019On Physical Adversarial Patches for Object Detectioncited by 93
  7. 2019Universal Physical Camouflage Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 91
  8. 2021Adversarial Laser Beam: Effective Physical-World Attack to DNNs in a Blinkcited by 75
  9. 2021Segment and Complete: Defending Object Detectors against Adversarial Patch Attacks with Robust Patch Detectioncited by 67
  10. 2020The Translucent Patch: A Physical and Universal Attack on Object Detectorscited by 62
  11. 2022T-SEA: Transfer-based Self-Ensemble Attack on Object Detectioncited by 59
  12. 2021Fooling thermal infrared pedestrian detectors in real world using small bulbscited by 51
  13. 2022DTA: Physical Camouflage Attacks using Differentiable Transformation Networkcited by 51
  14. 2020SLAP: Improving Physical Adversarial Examples with Short-Lived Adversarial Perturbationscited by 50
  15. 2022Infrared Invisible Clothing:Hiding from Infrared Detectors at Multiple Angles in Real Worldcited by 42
  16. 2023Physically Realizable Natural-Looking Clothing Textures Evade Person Detectors via 3D Modelingcited by 41
  17. 2023DAP: A Dynamic Adversarial Patch for Evading Person Detectorscited by 40
  18. 2019On adversarial patches: real-world attack on ArcFace-100 face recognition systemcited by 35
  19. 2018Invisible Mask: Practical Attacks on Face Recognition with Infraredcited by 33
  20. 2022Fooling the Eyes of Autonomous Vehicles: Robust Physical Adversarial Examples Against Traffic Sign Recognition Systemscited by 27
  21. 2022HOTCOLD Block: Fooling Thermal Infrared Detectors with a Novel Wearable Designcited by 27
  22. 2023Unified Adversarial Patch for Cross-modal Attacks in the Physical Worldcited by 27
  23. 2022Adversarial Attack and Defense of YOLO Detectors in Autonomous Driving Scenarioscited by 20
  24. 2024Invisible Reflections: Leveraging Infrared Laser Reflections to Target Traffic Sign Perceptioncited by 14
  25. 2024Infrared Adversarial Car Stickerscited by 8
  26. 2023The Adversarial Implications of Variable-Time Inferencecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.