mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Invisible Reflections: Leveraging Infrared Laser Reflections to Target Traffic Sign Perception

arXiv 2401.03582 ↗First posted 7 Jan 2024cs.CR cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

All vehicles must follow the rules that govern traffic behavior, regardless of whether the vehicles are human-driven or Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs). Road signs indicate locally active rules, such as speed limits and requirements to yield or stop. Recent research has demonstrated attacks, such as adding stickers or projected colored patches to signs, that cause CAV misinterpretation, resulting in potential safety issues. Humans can see and potentially defend against these attacks. But humans can not detect what they can not observe. We have developed an effective physical-world attack that leverages the sensitivity of filterless image sensors and the properties of Infrared Laser Reflections (ILRs), which are invisible to humans. The attack is designed to affect CAV cameras and perception, undermining traffic sign recognition by inducing misclassification. In this work, we formulate the threat model and requirements for an ILR-based traffic sign perception attack to succeed. We evaluate the effectiveness of the ILR attack with real-world experiments against two major traffic sign recognition architectures on four IR-sensitive cameras. Our black-box optimization methodology allows the attack to achieve up to a 100% attack success rate in indoor, static scenarios and a >80.5% attack success rate in our outdoor, moving vehicle scenarios. We find the latest state-of-the-art certifiable defense is ineffective against ILR attacks as it mis-certifies >33.5% of cases. To address this, we propose a detection strategy based on the physical properties of IR laser reflections which can detect 96% of ILR attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2024.

Builds on

33 of 93 references.

References · 33

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  7. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  8. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  9. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  10. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  11. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  12. 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
21 more
  1. 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
  2. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  3. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
  4. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 249
  5. 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
  6. 2018ShapeShifter: Robust Physical Adversarial Attack on Faster R-CNN Object Detectorcited by 159
  7. 2019Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 151
  8. 2022FILM: Frame Interpolation for Large Motioncited by 149
  9. 2022Shadows can be Dangerous: Stealthy and Effective Physical-world Adversarial Attack by Natural Phenomenoncited by 101
  10. 2020Certified Defenses for Adversarial Patchescited by 100
  11. 2020(De)Randomized Smoothing for Certifiable Defense against Patch Attackscited by 97
  12. 2021Adversarial Laser Beam: Effective Physical-World Attack to DNNs in a Blinkcited by 75
  13. 2021PatchCleanser: Certifiably Robust Defense against Adversarial Patches for Any Image Classifiercited by 63
  14. 2020SLAP: Improving Physical Adversarial Examples with Short-Lived Adversarial Perturbationscited by 50
  15. 2019The Mapillary Traffic Sign Dataset for Detection and Classification on a Global Scalecited by 49
  16. 2018Invisible Mask: Practical Attacks on Face Recognition with Infraredcited by 33
  17. 2022You Can't See Me: Physical Removal Attacks on LiDAR-based Autonomous Vehicles Driving Frameworkscited by 32
  18. 2022Fooling the Eyes of Autonomous Vehicles: Robust Physical Adversarial Examples Against Traffic Sign Recognition Systemscited by 27
  19. 2021They See Me Rollin': Inherent Vulnerability of the Rolling Shutter in CMOS Image Sensorscited by 17
  20. 2019Are Self-Driving Cars Secure? Evasion Attacks against Deep Neural Networks for Steering Angle Predictioncited by 16
  21. 2022Rolling Colors: Adversarial Laser Exploits against Traffic Light Recognitioncited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: