Towards Unsupervised Model Selection for Domain Adaptive Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating the performance of deep models in new scenarios has drawn increasing attention in recent years. However, while it is possible to collect data from new scenarios, the annotations are not always available. Existing DAOD methods often rely on validation or test sets on the target domain for model selection, which is impractical in real-world applications. In this paper, we propose a novel unsupervised model selection approach for domain adaptive object detection, which is able to select almost the optimal model for the target domain without using any target labels. Our approach is based on the flat minima principle, i,e., models located in the flat minima region in the parameter space usually exhibit excellent generalization ability. However, traditional methods require labeled data to evaluate how well a model is located in the flat minima region, which is unrealistic for the DAOD task. Therefore, we design a Detection Adaptation Score (DAS) approach to approximately measure the flat minima without using target labels. We show via a generalization bound that the flatness can be deemed as model variance, while the minima depend on the domain distribution distance for the DAOD task. Accordingly, we propose a Flatness Index Score (FIS) to assess the flatness by measuring the classification and localization fluctuation before and after perturbations of model parameters and a Prototypical Distance Ratio (PDR) score to seek the minima by measuring the transferability and discriminability of the models. In this way, the proposed DAS approach can effectively evaluate the model generalization ability on the target domain. We have conducted extensive experiments on various DAOD benchmarks and approaches, and the experimental results show that the proposed DAS correlates well with the performance of DAOD models and can be used as an effective tool for model selection after training.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2024.
Builds on
51 of 68 references.
References · 51
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
38 more
- 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
- 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
- 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,275
- 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
- 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 983
- 2019CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object Detectioncited by 654
- 2018Domain Adaptive Faster R-CNN for Object Detection in the Wildcited by 442
- 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 431
- 2017Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Datacited by 401
- 2019Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation via Minimax Entropycited by 333
- 2019Bridging Theory and Algorithm for Domain Adaptationcited by 332
- 2021DAFormer: Improving Network Architectures and Training Strategies for Domain-Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 299
- 2018Strong-Weak Distribution Alignment for Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 269
- 2018Cross-Domain Weakly-Supervised Object Detection through Progressive Domain Adaptationcited by 218
- 2016Driving in the Matrix: Can Virtual Worlds Replace Human-Generated Annotations for Real World Tasks?cited by 194
- 2020Unbiased Mean Teacher for Cross-domain Object Detectioncited by 158
- 2019Transferrable Prototypical Networks for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 141
- 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performancecited by 141
- 2020Harmonizing Transferability and Discriminability for Adapting Object Detectorscited by 125
- 2021Cross-Domain Adaptive Teacher for Object Detectioncited by 125
- 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
- 2020Cross-domain Detection via Graph-induced Prototype Alignmentcited by 109
- 2020Are Labels Always Necessary for Classifier Accuracy Evaluation?cited by 104
- 2016MultiNet: Real-time Joint Semantic Reasoning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 90
- 2022SIGMA: Semantic-complete Graph Matching for Domain Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 74
- 2022Learning Domain Adaptive Object Detection with Probabilistic Teachercited by 57
- 2021Detecting Errors and Estimating Accuracy on Unlabeled Data with Self-training Ensemblescited by 54
- 2023Contrastive Mean Teacher for Domain Adaptive Object Detectorscited by 52
- 2022Predicting Out-of-Distribution Error with the Projection Normcited by 50
- 2021Tune it the Right Way: Unsupervised Validation of Domain Adaptation via Soft Neighborhood Densitycited by 44
- 2020Bi-Classifier Determinacy Maximization for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 35
- 2023Characterizing Out-of-Distribution Error via Optimal Transportcited by 20
- 2024Energy-based Automated Model Evaluationcited by 16
- 2023Can We Evaluate Domain Adaptation Models Without Target-Domain Labels?cited by 14
- 2023Unsupervised Domain Adaptive Detection with Network Stability Analysiscited by 10
- 2023CAME: Contrastive Automated Model Evaluationcited by 6
- 2024Bounding Box Stability against Feature Dropout Reflects Detector Generalization across Environmentscited by 6
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Confidence and Dispersity as Signals: Unsupervised Model Evaluation and Rankingcited by 1
- 2026Domain Adaptive Object Detection via Dual-Stream Bilevel-Cycle Optimizationcited by 1
- 2025Cumulative Consensus Score: Label-Free and Model-Agnostic Evaluation of Object Detectors in Deploymentcited by 0
- 2025Neural Coherence : Find higher performance to out-of-distribution tasks from few samplescited by 0
- 2026Domain Adaptive Object Detection via Dual-Stream Bilevel-Cycle Optimization30 Jun 2026
- 2025Neural Coherence : Find higher performance to out-of-distribution tasks from few samples5 Dec 2025
- 2025Confidence and Dispersity as Signals: Unsupervised Model Evaluation and Ranking3 Oct 2025
- 2025Cumulative Consensus Score: Label-Free and Model-Agnostic Evaluation of Object Detectors in Deployment16 Sep 2025