Cumulative Consensus Score: Label-Free and Model-Agnostic Evaluation of Object Detectors in Deployment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating object detection models in deployment is challenging because ground-truth annotations are rarely available. We introduce the Cumulative Consensus Score (CCS), a label-free monitoring signal for continuous evaluation and comparison of detectors in real-world settings. CCS applies test-time data augmentation to each image and measures the spatial consistency of predicted bounding boxes across augmented views using Intersection over Union. The resulting consensus score serves as a proxy for reliability without requiring bounding box annotations. In controlled experiments on Open Images and KITTI, CCS achieved over 90% congruence with F1-score, Probabilistic Detection Quality, and Optimal Correction Cost, with qualitative consistency further confirmed on COCO and BDD100K across model pairs. The method is model-agnostic, working across single-stage and two-stage detectors, and operates at the case level to highlight under-performing scenarios. We also provide a simplified theoretical link between expected CCS and detection correctness. Altogether, CCS provides a robust foundation for DevOps-style monitoring of object detectors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2025.
Builds on
25 of 36 references.
References · 25
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,130
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,288
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
- 2018The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scalecited by 544
- 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 336
13 more
- 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 280
- 2020Better Aggregation in Test-Time Augmentationcited by 122
- 2020A Review and Comparative Study on Probabilistic Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 115
- 2017Dropout Sampling for Robust Object Detection in Open-Set Conditionscited by 112
- 2020Learning Loss for Test-Time Augmentationcited by 56
- 2018Probabilistic Object Detection: Definition and Evaluationcited by 55
- 2020Certified Defense to Image Transformations via Randomized Smoothingcited by 51
- 2021Consistency-based Active Learning for Object Detectioncited by 32
- 2021CertainNet: Sampling-free Uncertainty Estimation for Object Detectioncited by 15
- 2022Optimal Correction Cost for Object Detection Evaluationcited by 11
- 2023EvCenterNet: Uncertainty Estimation for Object Detection using Evidential Learningcited by 10
- 2024Bounding Box Stability against Feature Dropout Reflects Detector Generalization across Environmentscited by 6
- 2024Towards Unsupervised Model Selection for Domain Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.