mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding Individual Agent Importance in Multi-Agent System via Counterfactual Reasoning

arXiv 2412.15619 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2024cs.AI cs.MAcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explaining multi-agent systems (MAS) is urgent as these systems become increasingly prevalent in various applications. Previous work has proveided explanations for the actions or states of agents, yet falls short in understanding the black-boxed agent's importance within a MAS and the overall team strategy. To bridge this gap, we propose EMAI, a novel agent-level explanation approach that evaluates the individual agent's importance. Inspired by counterfactual reasoning, a larger change in reward caused by the randomized action of agent indicates its higher importance. We model it as a MARL problem to capture interactions across agents. Utilizing counterfactual reasoning, EMAI learns the masking agents to identify important agents. Specifically, we define the optimization function to minimize the reward difference before and after action randomization and introduce sparsity constraints to encourage the exploration of more action randomization of agents during training. The experimental results in seven multi-agent tasks demonstratee that EMAI achieves higher fidelity in explanations than baselines and provides more effective guidance in practical applications concerning understanding policies, launching attacks, and patching policies.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2024.

Builds on

20 of 50 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
  2. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 751
  3. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 708
  4. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
  5. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 597
  6. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 575
  7. 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 503
  8. 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 465
  9. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 379
  10. 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 313
  11. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 270
  12. 2019Google Research Football: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Environmentcited by 260
8 more
  1. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 200
  2. 2018Explaining Image Classifiers by Counterfactual Generationcited by 144
  3. 2017Visualizing and Understanding Atari Agentscited by 141
  4. 2021Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal Adversarycited by 135
  5. 2019Shapley Q-value: A Local Reward Approach to Solve Global Reward Gamescited by 73
  6. 2019Explain Your Move: Understanding Agent Actions Using Specific and Relevant Feature Attributioncited by 50
  7. 2018Establishing Appropriate Trust via Critical Statescited by 48
  8. 2020Delay-Aware Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Cooperative and Competitive Environmentscited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 5.

11 papers.