mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Counterfactual-based Agent Influence Ranker for Agentic AI Workflows

arXiv 2510.25612 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2025cs.AI cs.MAcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

An Agentic AI Workflow (AAW), also known as an LLM-based multi-agent system, is an autonomous system that assembles several LLM-based agents to work collaboratively towards a shared goal. The high autonomy, widespread adoption, and growing interest in such AAWs highlight the need for a deeper understanding of their operations, from both quality and security aspects. To this day, there are no existing methods to assess the influence of each agent on the AAW's final output. Adopting techniques from related fields is not feasible since existing methods perform only static structural analysis, which is unsuitable for inference time execution. We present Counterfactual-based Agent Influence Ranker (CAIR) - the first method for assessing the influence level of each agent on the AAW's output and determining which agents are the most influential. By performing counterfactual analysis, CAIR provides a task-agnostic analysis that can be used both offline and at inference time. We evaluate CAIR using an AAWs dataset of our creation, containing 30 different use cases with 230 different functionalities. Our evaluation showed that CAIR produces consistent rankings, outperforms baseline methods, and can easily enhance the effectiveness and relevancy of downstream tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2025.

Builds on

9 of 68 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2023Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial Promptingcited by 248
  5. 2025Fully Autonomous AI Agents Should Not be Developedcited by 43
  6. 2024Understanding Individual Agent Importance in Multi-Agent System via Counterfactual Reasoningcited by 10
  7. 2023Developer Experiences with a Contextualized AI Coding Assistant: Usability, Expectations, and Outcomescited by 9
  8. 2020Centrality Measures in Complex Networks: A Surveycited by 8
  9. 2023Deep Clustering for Data Cleaning and Integrationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Messier: A High-Resolution Corpus for Cross-Benchmark Agent Evaluation
  2. 2026Beyond Static Leaderboards: Predictive Validity for the Evaluation of LLM Agents
  3. 2025The Social Laboratory: A Psychometric Framework for Multi-Agent LLM Evaluation
  4. 2025DRF: LLM-AGENT Dynamic Reputation Filtering Framework
  5. 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey
  6. 2025GrowthHacker: Automated Off-Policy Evaluation Optimization Using Code-Modifying LLM Agents
  7. 2026IAPO: Influence-Aware Policy Optimization for Credit Assignment in Multi-Turn Service Agents
  8. 2025HiveMind: Contribution-Guided Online Prompt Optimization of LLM Multi-Agent Systems