MAGIC: Mastering Physical Adversarial Generation in Context through Collaborative LLM Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Physical adversarial attacks in driving scenarios can expose critical vulnerabilities in visual perception models. However, developing such attacks remains challenging due to diverse real-world environments and the requirement for maintaining visual naturality. Building upon this challenge, we reformulate physical adversarial attacks as a one-shot patch generation problem. Our approach generates adversarial patches through a deep generative model that considers the specific scene context, enabling direct physical deployment in matching environments. The primary challenge lies in simultaneously achieving two objectives: generating adversarial patches that effectively mislead object detection systems while determining contextually appropriate deployment within the scene. We propose MAGIC (Mastering Physical Adversarial Generation In Context), a novel framework powered by multi-modal LLM agents to address these challenges. MAGIC automatically understands scene context and generates adversarial patch through the synergistic interaction of language and vision capabilities. In particular, MAGIC orchestrates three specialized LLM agents: The adv-patch generation agent (GAgent) masters the creation of deceptive patches through strategic prompt engineering for text-to-image models. The adv-patch deployment agent (DAgent) ensures contextual coherence by determining optimal deployment strategies based on scene understanding. The self-examination agent (EAgent) completes this trilogy by providing critical oversight and iterative refinement of both processes. We validate our method on both digital and physical levels, i.e., nuImage and manually captured real-world scenes, where both statistical and visual results prove that our MAGIC is powerful and effective for attacking widely applied object detection systems, i.e., YOLO and DETR series.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 50 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2024.
Builds on
50 of 67 references.
References · 50
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
- 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,057
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2023VILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Modelscited by 686
- 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 529
38 more
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
- 2024YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 508
- 2023End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontierscited by 485
- 2023GPT-Driver: Learning to Drive with GPTcited by 344
- 2024LongVU: Spatiotemporal Adaptive Compression for Long Video-Language Understandingcited by 341
- 2023Set-of-Mark Prompting Unleashes Extraordinary Visual Grounding in GPT-4Vcited by 291
- 2023Role-Play with Large Language Modelscited by 290
- 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
- 2023AudioGPT: Understanding and Generating Speech, Music, Sound, and Talking Headcited by 264
- 2024Mastering Text-to-Image Diffusion: Recaptioning, Planning, and Generating with Multimodal LLMscited by 224
- 2023You Only Look at Screens: Multimodal Chain-of-Action Agentscited by 185
- 2021Panoptic nuScenes: A Large-Scale Benchmark for LiDAR Panoptic Segmentation and Trackingcited by 165
- 2018ShapeShifter: Robust Physical Adversarial Attack on Faster R-CNN Object Detectorcited by 159
- 2019Talk2Car: Taking Control of Your Self-Driving Carcited by 141
- 20223D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 132
- 2021Dual Attention Suppression Attack: Generate Adversarial Camouflage in Physical Worldcited by 127
- 2023LLaVA-Grounding: Grounded Visual Chat with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 113
- 2022Shadows can be Dangerous: Stealthy and Effective Physical-world Adversarial Attack by Natural Phenomenoncited by 101
- 2022SegPGD: An Effective and Efficient Adversarial Attack for Evaluating and Boosting Segmentation Robustnesscited by 74
- 2019PhysGAN: Generating Physical-World-Resilient Adversarial Examples for Autonomous Drivingcited by 72
- 2023MP5: A Multi-modal Open-ended Embodied System in Minecraft via Active Perceptioncited by 67
- 2022Physical Adversarial Attack meets Computer Vision: A Decade Surveycited by 66
- 2023Diffusion-Based Adversarial Sample Generation for Improved Stealthiness and Controllabilitycited by 66
- 2022Physical Attack on Monocular Depth Estimation with Optimal Adversarial Patchescited by 57
- 2022DTA: Physical Camouflage Attacks using Differentiable Transformation Networkcited by 51
- 2022Simultaneously Optimizing Perturbations and Positions for Black-box Adversarial Patch Attackscited by 41
- 2023Does Physical Adversarial Example Really Matter to Autonomous Driving? Towards System-Level Effect of Adversarial Object Evasion Attackcited by 37
- 2021TnT Attacks! Universal Naturalistic Adversarial Patches Against Deep Neural Network Systemscited by 36
- 2021Physical Adversarial Attacks on an Aerial Imagery Object Detectorcited by 35
- 2024Boosting Transferability in Vision-Language Attacks via Diversification along the Intersection Region of Adversarial Trajectorycited by 35
- 2021Robust Feature-Level Adversaries are Interpretability Toolscited by 27
- 2022SoK: On the Semantic AI Security in Autonomous Drivingcited by 22
- 2024SceneTAP: Scene-Coherent Typographic Adversarial Planner against Vision-Language Models in Real-World Environmentscited by 22
- 2023Unified Adversarial Patch for Visible-Infrared Cross-modal Attacks in the Physical Worldcited by 21
- 2024Towards Transferable Attacks Against Vision-LLMs in Autonomous Driving with Typographycited by 17
- 2022Contributions of Shape, Texture, and Color in Visual Recognitioncited by 16
- 2023Adversarial Attacks on Traffic Sign Recognition: A Surveycited by 13
- 2023Intriguing Properties of Diffusion Models: An Empirical Study of the Natural Attack Capability in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Safeguarding Vision-Language Models Against Patched Visual Prompt Injectors
- 2023Diffusion to Confusion: Naturalistic Adversarial Patch Generation Based on Diffusion Model for Object Detector
- 2026Partially Observable Adversarial Patch Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models in Robotics
- 2026Revealing Physical-World Semantic Vulnerabilities: Universal Adversarial Patch for Infrared Vision-Language Models
- 2025PhysPatch: A Physically Realizable and Transferable Adversarial Patch Attack for Multimodal Large Language Models-based Autonomous Driving Systems
- 2026Steal the Patch Size: Adversarially Manipulate Vision-Language Models
- 2025When Robots Obey the Patch: Universal Transferable Patch Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2024Prompt-Guided Environmentally Consistent Adversarial Patch