RLZero: Direct Policy Inference from Language Without In-Domain Supervision
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The reward hypothesis states that all goals and purposes can be understood as the maximization of a received scalar reward signal. However, in practice, defining such a reward signal is notoriously difficult, as humans are often unable to predict the optimal behavior corresponding to a reward function. Natural language offers an intuitive alternative for instructing reinforcement learning (RL) agents, yet previous language-conditioned approaches either require costly supervision or test-time training given a language instruction. In this work, we present a new approach that uses a pretrained RL agent trained using only unlabeled, offline interactions--without task-specific supervision or labeled trajectories--to get zero-shot test-time policy inference from arbitrary natural language instructions. We introduce a framework comprising three steps: imagine, project, and imitate. First, the agent imagines a sequence of observations corresponding to the provided language description using video generative models. Next, these imagined observations are projected into the target environment domain. Finally, an agent pretrained in the target environment with unsupervised RL instantly imitates the projected observation sequence through a closed-form solution. To the best of our knowledge, our method, RLZero, is the first approach to show direct language-to-behavior generation abilities on a variety of tasks and environments without any in-domain supervision. We further show that components of RLZero can be used to generate policies zero-shot from cross-embodied videos, such as those available on YouTube, even for complex embodiments like humanoids.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2024.
Builds on
53 of 87 references.
References · 53
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
- 2023Stable Video Diffusion: Scaling Latent Video Diffusion Models to Large Datasetscited by 2,581
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,597
- 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,322
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,293
- 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,210
- 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,035
38 more
- 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 993
- 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 956
- 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 899
- 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 752
- 2023Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Modelscited by 571
- 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 561
- 2022BC-Z: Zero-Shot Task Generalization with Robotic Imitation Learningcited by 523
- 2023Learning Universal Policies via Text-Guided Video Generationcited by 522
- 2023VideoPoet: A Large Language Model for Zero-Shot Video Generationcited by 492
- 2022InternVideo: General Video Foundation Models via Generative and Discriminative Learningcited by 447
- 2023Describe, Explain, Plan and Select: Interactive Planning with Large Language Models Enables Open-World Multi-Task Agentscited by 398
- 2022VIP: Towards Universal Visual Reward and Representation via Value-Implicit Pre-Trainingcited by 395
- 2024MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmarkcited by 372
- 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 340
- 2023Language to Rewards for Robotic Skill Synthesiscited by 312
- 2021IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for Imitationcited by 193
- 2019A Divergence Minimization Perspective on Imitation Learning Methodscited by 190
- 2023Vision-Language Models are Zero-Shot Reward Models for Reinforcement Learningcited by 165
- 2023Video Language Planningcited by 162
- 2023Text2Reward: Reward Shaping with Language Models for Reinforcement Learningcited by 160
- 2020Language-Conditioned Imitation Learning for Robot Manipulation Taskscited by 136
- 2023RoboCLIP: One Demonstration is Enough to Learn Robot Policiescited by 134
- 2021Learning One Representation to Optimize All Rewardscited by 115
- 2022Don't Change the Algorithm, Change the Data: Exploratory Data for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
- 2024Foundation Policies with Hilbert Representationscited by 94
- 2018The Laplacian in RL: Learning Representations with Efficient Approximationscited by 86
- 2023METRA: Scalable Unsupervised RL with Metric-Aware Abstractioncited by 86
- 2022Does Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Exist?cited by 83
- 2021Learning Successor States and Goal-Dependent Values: A Mathematical Viewpointcited by 70
- 2020f-IRL: Inverse Reinforcement Learning via State Marginal Matchingcited by 67
- 2023Vision-Language Models as a Source of Rewardscited by 66
- 2023Dual RL: Unification and New Methods for Reinforcement and Imitation Learningcited by 48
- 2021Adversarial Intrinsic Motivation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
- 2021The Information Geometry of Unsupervised Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
- 2020PixL2R: Guiding Reinforcement Learning Using Natural Language by Mapping Pixels to Rewardscited by 30
- 2023SMORE: Score Models for Offline Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2024Proto Successor Measure: Representing the Behavior Space of an RL Agentcited by 20
- 2023Learning Video-Conditioned Policies for Unseen Manipulation Taskscited by 16
50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2025Zero-Shot Adaptation of Behavioral Foundation Models to Unseen Dynamicscited by 8
- 2026Compositional Planning with Jumpy World Modelscited by 7
- 2025Unifying Agent Interaction and World Information for Multi-agent Coordinationcited by 2
- 2026Zero-Shot Off-Policy Learningcited by 2
- 2026Regularized Latent Dynamics Prediction is a Strong Baseline For Behavioral Foundation Modelscited by 2
- 2025Supervised Reward Inferencecited by 0
- 2026InterEvolve: Test-Time Evolution of Reward Programs for Humanoid Loco-Manipulationcited by 0
- 2026InterEvolve: Test-Time Evolution of Reward Programs for Humanoid Loco-Manipulation1 Oct 2026
- 2026Regularized Latent Dynamics Prediction is a Strong Baseline For Behavioral Foundation Models16 Mar 2026
- 2026Compositional Planning with Jumpy World Models23 Feb 2026
- 2026Zero-Shot Off-Policy Learning2 Feb 2026
- 2025Unifying Agent Interaction and World Information for Multi-agent Coordination29 Sep 2025
- 2025Zero-Shot Adaptation of Behavioral Foundation Models to Unseen Dynamics19 May 2025
- 2025Supervised Reward Inference25 Feb 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2019From Language to Goals: Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Instruction Following
- 2018Learning to Understand Goal Specifications by Modelling Reward
- 2023Reward Design with Language Models
- 2025PARL: Prompt-based Agents for Reinforcement Learning
- 2026From Demonstrations to Rewards: Test-Time Prompt Optimization for VLM Reward Models
- 2026Reward-Zero: Language Embedding Driven Implicit Reward Mechanisms for Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Ground-Compose-Reinforce: Grounding Language in Agentic Behaviours using Limited Data
- 2026ASPECT:Analogical Semantic Policy Execution via Language Conditioned Transfer