Preference-based Pure Exploration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the preference-based pure exploration problem for bandits with vector-valued rewards. The rewards are ordered using a (given) preference cone C and our goal is to identify the set of Pareto optimal arms. First, to quantify the impact of preferences, we derive a novel lower bound on sample complexity for identifying the most preferred policy with a confidence level 1-δ. Our lower bound elicits the role played by the geometry of the preference cone and punctuates the difference in hardness compared to existing best-arm identification variants of the problem. We further explicate this geometry when the rewards follow Gaussian distributions. We then provide a convex relaxation of the lower bound and leverage it to design the Preference-based Track and Stop (PreTS) algorithm that identifies the most preferred policy. Finally, we show that the sample complexity of PreTS is asymptotically tight by deriving a new concentration inequality for vector-valued rewards.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2024.
Builds on
19 of 54 references.
References · 19
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 699
- 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 286
- 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 239
- 2013lil' UCB : An Optimal Exploration Algorithm for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 149
- 2014Best-Arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 100
- 2018Mixture Martingales Revisited with Applications to Sequential Tests and Confidence Intervalscited by 76
- 2020Optimal Best-arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 71
- 2019Pure Exploration with Multiple Correct Answerscited by 64
- 2014Lipschitz Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 60
- 2013Parallel Gaussian Process Optimization with Upper Confidence Bound and Pure Explorationcited by 50
- 2022Top Two Algorithms Revisitedcited by 34
- 2018Multi-objective Contextual Bandit Problem with Similarity Informationcited by 21
7 more
- 2020Adaptive Sampling for Best Policy Identification in Markov Decision Processescited by 20
- 2019Multi-Objective Generalized Linear Banditscited by 19
- 2023Adaptive Algorithms for Relaxed Pareto Set Identificationcited by 15
- 2023Bandit Pareto Set Identification: the Fixed Budget Settingcited by 14
- 2021Vector Optimization with Stochastic Bandit Feedbackcited by 12
- 2023Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet?cited by 11
- 2021Procrastinated Tree Search: Black-box Optimization with Delayed, Noisy, and Multi-Fidelity Feedbackcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025FraPPE: Fast and Efficient Preference-based Pure Explorationcited by 4
- 2025The Fair Game: Auditing & Debiasing AI Algorithms Over Timecited by 0
- 2026Selective Ensemble Based on Preference-Directed Multi-Objective Banditscited by 0
- 2026Few-for-Many Best-Arm Identification in Multi-Objective Banditscited by 0
- 2026When More Objectives Make Identification Easier: The Role of Preferences and Feedbackcited by 0
- 2026When More Objectives Make Identification Easier: The Role of Preferences and Feedback13 Oct 2026
- 2026Few-for-Many Best-Arm Identification in Multi-Objective Bandits12 Oct 2026
- 2026Selective Ensemble Based on Preference-Directed Multi-Objective Bandits20 Jun 2026
- 2025FraPPE: Fast and Efficient Preference-based Pure Exploration22 Aug 2025
- 2025The Fair Game: Auditing & Debiasing AI Algorithms Over Time8 Aug 2025