mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Multi-objective Contextual Bandit Problem with Similarity Information

arXiv 1803.04015 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2018stat.ML cs.LGcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper we propose the multi-objective contextual bandit problem with similarity information. This problem extends the classical contextual bandit problem with similarity information by introducing multiple and possibly conflicting objectives. Since the best arm in each objective can be different given the context, learning the best arm based on a single objective can jeopardize the rewards obtained from the other objectives. In order to evaluate the performance of the learner in this setup, we use a performance metric called the contextual Pareto regret. Essentially, the contextual Pareto regret is the sum of the distances of the arms chosen by the learner to the context dependent Pareto front. For this problem, we develop a new online learning algorithm called Pareto Contextual Zooming (PCZ), which exploits the idea of contextual zooming to learn the arms that are close to the Pareto front for each observed context by adaptively partitioning the joint context-arm set according to the observed rewards and locations of the context-arm pairs selected in the past. Then, we prove that PCZ achieves tilde O (T(1+dp)/(2+dp)) Pareto regret where dp is the Pareto zooming dimension that depends on the size of the set of near-optimal context-arm pairs. Moreover, we show that this regret bound is nearly optimal by providing an almost matching Omega (T(1+dp)/(2+dp)) lower bound.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 242
  2. 2022Almost Optimal Variance-Constrained Best Arm Identificationcited by 16
  3. 2023Learning Personalized Decision Support Policiescited by 13
  4. 2024Traversing Pareto Optimal Policies: Provably Efficient Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  5. 2021Vector Optimization with Stochastic Bandit Feedbackcited by 10
  6. 2025On Generalization Across Environments In Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  7. 2022Integrating Reward Maximization and Population Estimation: Sequential Decision-Making for Internal Revenue Service Audit Selectioncited by 5
  8. 2025Provably Efficient Multi-Objective Bandit Algorithms under Preference-Centric Customizationcited by 5
  9. 2024Preference-based Pure Explorationcited by 3
  10. 2024The Digital Transformation in Health: How AI Can Improve the Performance of Health Systemscited by 1
  11. 2025Stochastic Multi-Objective Multi-Armed Bandits: Regret Definition and Algorithmcited by 1
  12. 2025Thompson Sampling for Multi-Objective Linear Contextual Banditcited by 1
7 more
  1. 2022Robust Pareto Set Identification with Contaminated Bandit Feedbackcited by 0
  2. 2024Online Pareto-Optimal Decision-Making for Complex Tasks using Active Inferencecited by 0
  3. 2024Unlocking the Potential of Global Human Expertisecited by 0
  4. 2025Vector preference-based contextual bandits under distributional shiftscited by 0
  5. 2026Are Stochastic Multi-objective Bandits Harder than Single-objective Bandits?cited by 0
  6. 2026Provably Efficient Personalized Multi-Objective Bandits with Proactive Conversational Queriescited by 0
  7. 2026Efficient Online Lexicographic Generalized Low-Rank Matrix Banditscited by 0