The Fair Game: Auditing & Debiasing AI Algorithms Over Time
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An emerging field of AI, namely Fair Machine Learning (ML), aims to quantify different types of bias (also known as unfairness) exhibited in the predictions of ML algorithms, and to design new algorithms to mitigate them. Often, the definitions of bias used in the literature are observational, i.e. they use the input and output of a pre-trained algorithm to quantify a bias under concern. In reality,these definitions are often conflicting in nature and can only be deployed if either the ground truth is known or only in retrospect after deploying the algorithm. Thus,there is a gap between what we want Fair ML to achieve and what it does in a dynamic social environment. Hence, we propose an alternative dynamic mechanism,"Fair Game",to assure fairness in the predictions of an ML algorithm and to adapt its predictions as the society interacts with the algorithm over time. "Fair Game" puts together an Auditor and a Debiasing algorithm in a loop around an ML algorithm. The "Fair Game" puts these two components in a loop by leveraging Reinforcement Learning (RL). RL algorithms interact with an environment to take decisions, which yields new observations (also known as data/feedback) from the environment and in turn, adapts future decisions. RL is already used in algorithms with pre-fixed long-term fairness goals. "Fair Game" provides a unique framework where the fairness goals can be adapted over time by only modifying the auditor and the different biases it quantifies. Thus,"Fair Game" aims to simulate the evolution of ethical and legal frameworks in the society by creating an auditor which sends feedback to a debiasing algorithm deployed around an ML system. This allows us to develop a flexible and adaptive-over-time framework to build Fair ML systems pre- and post-deployment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 72 of its 131 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2025.
Builds on
72 of 131 references.
References · 72
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
- 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 734
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 656
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
38 more
- 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 412
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
- 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulation with Asynchronous Off-Policy Updatescited by 353
- 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignmentcited by 285
- 2023Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 149
- 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
- 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
- 2024Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferencescited by 144
- 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 141
- 2017Fairness Testing: Testing Software for Discriminationcited by 126
- 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
- 2018Optimization with Non-Differentiable Constraints with Applications to Fairness, Recall, Churn, and Other Goalscited by 103
- 2020Fair Regression with Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 100
- 2024Social Choice Should Guide AI Alignment in Dealing with Diverse Human Feedbackcited by 100
- 2020Model-Based Multi-Agent RL in Zero-Sum Markov Games with Near-Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 92
- 2021Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 84
- 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
- 2024On the Algorithmic Bias of Aligning Large Language Models with RLHF: Preference Collapse and Matching Regularizationcited by 72
- 2021Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challengescited by 56
- 2018Fairness Through Computationally-Bounded Awarenesscited by 55
- 2022The Complexity of Markov Equilibrium in Stochastic Gamescited by 49
- 2019On the Convergence of Model Free Learning in Mean Field Gamescited by 48
- 2018Probabilistic Verification of Fairness Properties via Concentrationcited by 45
- 2017Calibrated Fairness in Banditscited by 43
- 2022When Privacy Meets Partial Information: A Refined Analysis of Differentially Private Banditscited by 28
- 2022Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning of Partially Observable Markov Gamescited by 27
- 2022Active Fairness Auditingcited by 27
- 2022Near-Optimal Learning of Extensive-Form Games with Imperfect Informationcited by 26
- 2020Justicia: A Stochastic SAT Approach to Formally Verify Fairnesscited by 25
- 2023Statistical Inference for Fairness Auditingcited by 20
- 2022Differential Privacy has Bounded Impact on Fairness in Classificationcited by 18
- 2024GenderAlign: An Alignment Dataset for Mitigating Gender Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 18
- 2021Probabilistic Verification of Neural Networks Against Group Fairnesscited by 17
- 2021Algorithmic Fairness Verification with Graphical Modelscited by 16
- 2022On the convergence of policy gradient methods to Nash equilibria in general stochastic gamescited by 16
- 2019DP-LSSGD: A Stochastic Optimization Method to Lift the Utility in Privacy-Preserving ERMcited by 15
50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025FAIRGAME: a Framework for AI Agents Bias Recognition using Game Theory
- 2026Fairness under uncertainty in sequential decisions
- 2024Fairness in Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
- 2026Fair Recourse for All: Ensuring Individual and Group Fairness in Counterfactual Explanations
- 2025FAIRTOPIA: Envisioning Multi-Agent Guardianship for Disrupting Unfair AI Pipelines
- 2024Data Acquisition for Improving Model Fairness using Reinforcement Learning
- 2025A Causal Lens for Learning Long-term Fair Policies
- 2025Adversarial Bias: Data Poisoning Attacks on Fairness