mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

ConfPO: Exploiting Policy Model Confidence for Critical Token Selection in Preference Optimization

arXiv 2506.08712 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 10

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce ConfPO, a method for preference learning in Large Language Models (LLMs) that identifies and optimizes preference-critical tokens based solely on the training policy's confidence, without requiring any auxiliary models or compute. Unlike prior Direct Alignment Algorithms (DAAs) such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), which uniformly adjust all token probabilities regardless of their relevance to preference, ConfPO focuses optimization on the most impactful tokens. This targeted approach improves alignment quality while mitigating overoptimization (i.e., reward hacking) by using the KL divergence budget more efficiently. In contrast to recent token-level methods that rely on credit-assignment models or AI annotators, raising concerns about scalability and reliability, ConfPO is simple, lightweight, and model-free. Experimental results on challenging alignment benchmarks, including AlpacaEval 2 and Arena-Hard, demonstrate that ConfPO consistently outperforms uniform DAAs across various LLMs, delivering better alignment with zero additional computational overhead.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 29 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.

Builds on

29 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Selective Preference Optimization via Token-Level Reward Function Estimation24 Aug
  2. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  3. 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimization18 Apr
  4. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
  5. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
  6. 2023Beyond Imitation: Leveraging Fine-grained Quality Signals for Alignment7 Nov
  7. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  8. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 21

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,986
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  3. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,871
  4. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,123
  5. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,077
  6. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 877
  7. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 833
  8. 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 459
  9. 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 400
  10. 2024Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMscited by 269
  11. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 207
  12. 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithmscited by 142
9 more
  1. 2024Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizercited by 109
  2. 2024C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersioncited by 83
  3. 2024Step-level Value Preference Optimization for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 72
  4. 2020Human Sentence Processing: Recurrence or Attention?cited by 51
  5. 2024TLCR: Token-Level Continuous Reward for Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 43
  6. 2022Information-Theoretic Text Hallucination Reduction for Video-grounded Dialoguecited by 18
  7. 2023ESD: Expected Squared Difference as a Tuning-Free Trainable Calibration Measurecited by 13
  8. 2024T-REG: Preference Optimization with Token-Level Reward Regularizationcited by 13
  9. 2024TPC: Test-time Procrustes Calibration for Diffusion-based Human Image Animationcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 7.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Not All Preferences are What You Need for Post-Training: Selective Alignment Strategy for Preference Optimization
  2. 2026TokenRatio: Principled Token-Level Preference Optimization via Ratio Matching
  3. 2026A Zeroth-Order Paradigm for LLM Preference Alignment
  4. 2025Robust LLM Alignment via Distributionally Robust Direct Preference Optimization
  5. 2024A Deep Dive into the Trade-Offs of Parameter-Efficient Preference Alignment Techniques
  6. 2024iREPO: implicit Reward Pairwise Difference based Empirical Preference Optimization
  7. 2024Anchored Preference Optimization and Contrastive Revisions: Addressing Underspecification in Alignment
  8. 2025Preference Orchestrator: Prompt-Aware Multi-Objective Alignment for Large Language Models