Understanding Communication Preferences of Information Workers in Engagement with Text-Based Conversational Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
Communication traits in text-based human-AI conversations play pivotal roles in shaping user experiences and perceptions of systems. With the advancement of large language models (LLMs), it is now feasible to analyze these traits at a more granular level. In this study, we explore the preferences of information workers regarding chatbot communication traits across seven applications. Participants were invited to participate in an interactive survey, which featured adjustable sliders, allowing them to adjust and express their preferences for five key communication traits: formality, personification, empathy, sociability, and humor. Our findings reveal distinct communication preferences across different applications; for instance, there was a preference for relatively high empathy in wellbeing contexts and relatively low personification in coding. Similarities in preferences were also noted between applications such as chatbots for customer service and scheduling. These insights offer crucial design guidelines for future chatbots, emphasizing the need for nuanced trait adjustments for each application.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2024.
Builds on
15 of 98 references.
References · 15
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2018The Design and Implementation of XiaoIce, an Empathetic Social Chatbotcited by 172
- 2024CodeAid: Evaluating a Classroom Deployment of an LLM-based Programming Assistant that Balances Student and Educator Needscited by 84
- 2023Let the LLMs Talk: Simulating Human-to-Human Conversational QA via Zero-Shot LLM-to-LLM Interactionscited by 70
- 2019How should my chatbot interact? A survey on human-chatbot interaction designcited by 56
- 2023Let's Think Outside the Box: Exploring Leap-of-Thought in Large Language Models with Creative Humor Generationcited by 56
- 2023Facilitating Self-Guided Mental Health Interventions Through Human-Language Model Interaction: A Case Study of Cognitive Restructuringcited by 53
- 2023MindfulDiary: Harnessing Large Language Model to Support Psychiatric Patients' Journalingcited by 50
- 2020If I Hear You Correctly: Building and Evaluating Interview Chatbots with Active Listening Skillscited by 20
- 2024"If the Machine Is As Good As Me, Then What Use Am I?" -- How the Use of ChatGPT Changes Young Professionals' Perception of Productivity and Accomplishmentcited by 19
- 2018Understanding Chatbot-mediated Task Managementcited by 12
- 2023Understanding the Role of Large Language Models in Personalizing and Scaffolding Strategies to Combat Academic Procrastinationcited by 12
3 more
- 2023CatAlyst: Domain-Extensible Intervention for Preventing Task Procrastination Using Large Generative Modelscited by 10
- 2023Affective Conversational Agents: Understanding Expectations and Personal Influencescited by 6
- 2024Can a Funny Chatbot Make a Difference? Infusing Humor into Conversational Agent for Behavioral Interventioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2025Prototypical Human-AI Collaboration Behaviors from LLM-Assisted Writing in the Wildcited by 25
- 2025HumT DumT: Measuring and controlling human-like language in LLMscited by 12
- 2025Dehumanizing Machines: Mitigating Anthropomorphic Behaviors in Text Generation Systemscited by 11
- 2025SENSE-7: Taxonomy and Dataset for Measuring User Perceptions of Empathy in Sustained Human-AI Conversationscited by 9
- 2025FeedQUAC: Quick Unobtrusive AI-Generated Commentarycited by 2
- 2026UXBench Pro: Benchmarking Personalized User Experience in Multi-Turn Dialogue Interactionscited by 0
- 2026UXBench Pro: Benchmarking Personalized User Experience in Multi-Turn Dialogue Interactions8 Oct 2026
- 2025SENSE-7: Taxonomy and Dataset for Measuring User Perceptions of Empathy in Sustained Human-AI Conversations19 Sep 2025
- 2025Prototypical Human-AI Collaboration Behaviors from LLM-Assisted Writing in the Wild21 May 2025
- 2025FeedQUAC: Quick Unobtrusive AI-Generated Commentary23 Apr 2025
- 2025Dehumanizing Machines: Mitigating Anthropomorphic Behaviors in Text Generation Systems19 Feb 2025
- 2025HumT DumT: Measuring and controlling human-like language in LLMs18 Feb 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Beyond Words: Infusing Conversational Agents with Human-like Typing Behaviors
- 2025Vibe Check: Understanding the Effects of LLM-Based Conversational Agents' Personality and Alignment on User Perceptions in Goal-Oriented Tasks
- 2026ExpressionCueLens: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Human-AI Companion Conversations on Social Media ↗
- 2025Human Preferences for Constructive Interactions in Language Model Alignment
- 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits
- 2026Mimetic Alignment with ASPECT: Evaluation of AI-inferred Personal Profiles
- 2026Behavior-Adaptive Conversational Agents: Toward a Fluid Personality Framework
- 2023On the Effectiveness of Creating Conversational Agent Personalities Through Prompting