mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CatAlyst: Domain-Extensible Intervention for Preventing Task Procrastination Using Large Generative Models

arXiv 2302.05678 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2023cs.HC cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

CatAlyst uses generative models to help workers' progress by influencing their task engagement instead of directly contributing to their task outputs. It prompts distracted workers to resume their tasks by generating a continuation of their work and presenting it as an intervention that is more context-aware than conventional (predetermined) feedback. The prompt can function by drawing their interest and lowering the hurdle for resumption even when the generated continuation is insufficient to substitute their work, while recent human-AI collaboration research aiming at work substitution depends on a stable high accuracy. This frees CatAlyst from domain-specific model-tuning and makes it applicable to various tasks. Our studies involving writing and slide-editing tasks demonstrated CatAlyst's effectiveness in helping workers swiftly resume tasks with a lowered cognitive load. The results suggest a new form of human-AI collaboration where large generative models publicly available but imperfect for each individual domain can contribute to workers' digital well-being.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2023.

Builds on

26 of 90 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  6. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  7. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  8. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  9. 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 599
  10. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
  11. 2022CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilitiescited by 245
  12. 2018Sentence Encoders on STILTs: Supplementary Training on Intermediate Labeled-data Taskscited by 214
14 more
  1. 2020Carbontracker: Tracking and Predicting the Carbon Footprint of Training Deep Learning Modelscited by 168
  2. 2019Gmail Smart Compose: Real-Time Assisted Writingcited by 97
  3. 2022Productivity Assessment of Neural Code Completioncited by 97
  4. 2022PEER: A Collaborative Language Modelcited by 86
  5. 2019Unremarkable AI: Fitting Intelligent Decision Support into Critical, Clinical Decision-Making Processescited by 53
  6. 2022Beyond Text Generation: Supporting Writers with Continuous Automatic Text Summariescited by 47
  7. 2019Ask Not What AI Can Do, But What AI Should Do: Towards a Framework of Task Delegabilitycited by 36
  8. 2022Telling Stories from Computational Notebooks: AI-Assisted Presentation Slides Creation for Presenting Data Science Workcited by 15
  9. 2020Nudge: Accelerating Overdue Pull Requests Towards Completioncited by 6
  10. 2022Examining Autocompletion as a Basic Concept for Interaction with Generative AIcited by 4
  11. 2021Mindless Attractor: A False-Positive Resistant Intervention for Drawing Attention Using Auditory Perturbationcited by 3
  12. 2022AI for human assessment: What do professional assessors need?cited by 3
  13. 2022How can Email Interventions Increase Students' Completion of Online Homework? A Case Study Using A/B Comparisonscited by 2
  14. 2021Writers Gonna Wait: The Effectiveness of Notifications to Initiate Aversive Action in Writing Procrastinationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

10 papers.