mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Effectiveness of Creating Conversational Agent Personalities Through Prompting

arXiv 2310.11182 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2023cs.HCcited by 10

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we report on the effectiveness of our efforts to tailor the personality and conversational style of a conversational agent based on GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 through prompts. We use three personality dimensions with two levels each to create eight conversational agents archetypes. Ten conversations were collected per chatbot, of ten exchanges each, generating 1600 exchanges across GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) analysis, we compared the eight agents on language elements including clout, authenticity, and emotion. Four language cues were significantly distinguishing in GPT-3.5, while twelve were distinguishing in GPT-4. With thirteen out of a total nineteen cues in LIWC appearing as significantly distinguishing, our results suggest possible novel prompting approaches may be needed to better suit the creation and evaluation of persistent conversational agent personalities or language styles.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2023.

Builds on

8 of 52 references.

References · 8

  1. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  2. 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
  3. 2019Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Goodcited by 207
  4. 2023Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4cited by 202
  5. 2023The Programmer's Assistant: Conversational Interaction with a Large Language Model for Software Developmentcited by 95
  6. 2020If I Hear You Correctly: Building and Evaluating Interview Chatbots with Active Listening Skillscited by 20
  7. 2019Maximizing Stylistic Control and Semantic Accuracy in NLG: Personality Variation and Discourse Contrastcited by 12
  8. 2023Is ChatGPT a Biomedical Expert? -- Exploring the Zero-Shot Performance of Current GPT Models in Biomedical Taskscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 6.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Personality, Role, and Expressive Style in Large Language Models: An Interactionist Analysis
  2. 2026A Concise Agent is Less Expert: Revealing Side Effects of Using Style Features on Conversational Agents
  3. 2025Beyond Words: Infusing Conversational Agents with Human-like Typing Behaviors
  4. 2026Behavior-Adaptive Conversational Agents: Toward a Fluid Personality Framework
  5. 2025Large Language Model Agent Personality and Response Appropriateness: Evaluation by Human Linguistic Experts, LLM-as-Judge, and Natural Language Processing Model
  6. 2024Open Models, Closed Minds? On Agents Capabilities in Mimicking Human Personalities through Open Large Language Models
  7. 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits
  8. 2023Prompt Your Mind: Refine Personalized Text Prompts within Your Mind