On the Effectiveness of Creating Conversational Agent Personalities Through Prompting
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we report on the effectiveness of our efforts to tailor the personality and conversational style of a conversational agent based on GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 through prompts. We use three personality dimensions with two levels each to create eight conversational agents archetypes. Ten conversations were collected per chatbot, of ten exchanges each, generating 1600 exchanges across GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) analysis, we compared the eight agents on language elements including clout, authenticity, and emotion. Four language cues were significantly distinguishing in GPT-3.5, while twelve were distinguishing in GPT-4. With thirteen out of a total nineteen cues in LIWC appearing as significantly distinguishing, our results suggest possible novel prompting approaches may be needed to better suit the creation and evaluation of persistent conversational agent personalities or language styles.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2023.
Builds on
8 of 52 references.
References · 8
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
- 2019Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Goodcited by 207
- 2023Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4cited by 202
- 2023The Programmer's Assistant: Conversational Interaction with a Large Language Model for Software Developmentcited by 95
- 2020If I Hear You Correctly: Building and Evaluating Interview Chatbots with Active Listening Skillscited by 20
- 2019Maximizing Stylistic Control and Semantic Accuracy in NLG: Personality Variation and Discourse Contrastcited by 12
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Biomedical Expert? -- Exploring the Zero-Shot Performance of Current GPT Models in Biomedical Taskscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 6.
10 papers.
- 2024LLM Agents in Interaction: Measuring Personality Consistency and Linguistic Alignment in Interacting Populations of Large Language Modelscited by 33
- 2024The Effects of Embodiment and Personality Expression on Learning in LLM-based Educational Agentscited by 13
- 2024Self-assessment, Exhibition, and Recognition: a Review of Personality in Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2024An Empirical Categorization of Prompting Techniques for Large Language Models: A Practitioner's Guidecited by 7
- 2025Giving AI Personalities Leads to More Human-Like Reasoningcited by 3
- 2025Curiosity by Design: An LLM-based Coding Assistant Asking Clarification Questionscited by 3
- 2025Promoting Online Safety by Simulating Unsafe Conversations with LLMscited by 0
- 2025PILOT: Steering Synthetic Data Generation with Psychological & Linguistic Output Targetingcited by 0
- 2025Student Development Agent: Risk-free Simulation for Evaluating AIED Innovationscited by 0
- 2025Chatbots to strengthen democracy: An interdisciplinary seminar to train identifying argumentation techniques of science denialcited by 0
- 2025Chatbots to strengthen democracy: An interdisciplinary seminar to train identifying argumentation techniques of science denial21 Nov 2025
- 2025Student Development Agent: Risk-free Simulation for Evaluating AIED Innovations10 Oct 2025
- 2025PILOT: Steering Synthetic Data Generation with Psychological & Linguistic Output Targeting18 Sep 2025
- 2025Promoting Online Safety by Simulating Unsafe Conversations with LLMs29 Jul 2025
- 2025Curiosity by Design: An LLM-based Coding Assistant Asking Clarification Questions28 Jul 2025
- 2025Giving AI Personalities Leads to More Human-Like Reasoning19 Feb 2025
- 2024Self-assessment, Exhibition, and Recognition: a Review of Personality in Large Language Models25 Jun 2024
- 2024The Effects of Embodiment and Personality Expression on Learning in LLM-based Educational Agents24 Jun 2024
- 2024An Empirical Categorization of Prompting Techniques for Large Language Models: A Practitioner's Guide18 Feb 2024
- 2024LLM Agents in Interaction: Measuring Personality Consistency and Linguistic Alignment in Interacting Populations of Large Language Models5 Feb 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Personality, Role, and Expressive Style in Large Language Models: An Interactionist Analysis
- 2026A Concise Agent is Less Expert: Revealing Side Effects of Using Style Features on Conversational Agents
- 2025Beyond Words: Infusing Conversational Agents with Human-like Typing Behaviors
- 2026Behavior-Adaptive Conversational Agents: Toward a Fluid Personality Framework
- 2025Large Language Model Agent Personality and Response Appropriateness: Evaluation by Human Linguistic Experts, LLM-as-Judge, and Natural Language Processing Model
- 2024Open Models, Closed Minds? On Agents Capabilities in Mimicking Human Personalities through Open Large Language Models
- 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits
- 2023Prompt Your Mind: Refine Personalized Text Prompts within Your Mind