mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Words: Infusing Conversational Agents with Human-like Typing Behaviors

arXiv 2510.08912 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2025cs.HCcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, large language models have facilitated the emergence of highly intelligent conversational AI capable of engaging in human-like dialogues. However, a notable distinction lies in the fact that these AI models predominantly generate responses rapidly, often producing extensive content without emulating the thoughtful process characteristic of human cognition and typing. This paper presents a design aimed at simulating human-like typing behaviors, including patterns such as hesitation and self-editing, as well as a preliminary user experiment to understand whether and to what extent the agent with human-like typing behaviors could potentially affect conversational engagement and its trustworthiness. We've constructed an interactive platform featuring user-adjustable parameters, allowing users to personalize the AI's communication style and thus cultivate a more enriching and immersive conversational experience. Our user experiment, involving interactions with three types of agents - a baseline agent, one simulating hesitation, and another integrating both hesitation and self-editing behaviors - reveals a preference for the agent that incorporates both behaviors, suggesting an improvement in perceived naturalness and trustworthiness. Through the insights from our design process and both quantitative and qualitative feedback from user experiments, this paper contributes to the multimodal interaction design and user experience for conversational AI, advocating for a more human-like, engaging, and trustworthy communication paradigm.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.

Builds on

5 of 53 references.

References · 5

  1. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
  2. 2023A Comprehensive Capability Analysis of GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Series Modelscited by 246
  3. 2023How Robust is GPT-3.5 to Predecessors? A Comprehensive Study on Language Understanding Taskscited by 58
  4. 2021SIMMC 2.0: A Task-oriented Dialog Dataset for Immersive Multimodal Conversationscited by 56
  5. 2013Artificial Intelligence MArkup Language: A Brief Tutorialcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023On the Effectiveness of Creating Conversational Agent Personalities Through Prompting
  2. 2025Humanlike Multi-user Agent (HUMA): Designing a Deceptively Human AI Facilitator for Group Chats
  3. 2025Human vs. Agent in Task-Oriented Conversations
  4. 2024Language Models in Dialogue: Conversational Maxims for Human-AI Interactions
  5. 2026Feedback by Design: Understanding and Overcoming User Feedback Barriers in Conversational Agents
  6. 2024Open Models, Closed Minds? On Agents Capabilities in Mimicking Human Personalities through Open Large Language Models
  7. 2024Understanding Communication Preferences of Information Workers in Engagement with Text-Based Conversational Agents
  8. 2025Towards Anthropomorphic Conversational AI Part I: A Practical Framework