mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

COS-DPO: Conditioned One-Shot Multi-Objective Fine-Tuning Framework

arXiv 2410.08316 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.CL math.OCcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

In LLM alignment and many other ML applications, one often faces the Multi-Objective Fine-Tuning (MOFT) problem, i.e., fine-tuning an existing model with datasets labeled w.r.t. different objectives simultaneously. To address the challenge, we propose a Conditioned One-Shot fine-tuning framework (COS-DPO) that extends the Direct Preference Optimization technique, originally developed for efficient LLM alignment with preference data, to accommodate the MOFT settings. By direct conditioning on the weight across auxiliary objectives, our Weight-COS-DPO method enjoys an efficient one-shot training process for profiling the Pareto front and is capable of achieving comprehensive trade-off solutions even in the post-training stage. Based on our theoretical findings on the linear transformation properties of the loss function, we further propose the Temperature-COS-DPO method that augments the temperature parameter to the model input, enhancing the flexibility of post-training control over the trade-offs between the main and auxiliary objectives. We demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the COS-DPO framework through its applications to various tasks, including the Learning-to-Rank (LTR) and LLM alignment tasks, highlighting its viability for large-scale ML deployments.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 47 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.

Builds on

47 of 69 references.

Closest ancestors · 16

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024β-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic β11 Jul
  2. 2024Preference Learning Algorithms Do Not Learn Preference Rankings29 May
  3. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function18 Apr
  4. 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimization18 Apr
  5. 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study16 Apr
  6. 2024Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignment29 Feb
  7. 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards28 Feb
  8. 2024Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive20 Feb
  9. 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustment15 Feb
  10. 2024Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline Alignment8 Feb
  11. 2024LiPO: Listwise Preference Optimization through Learning-to-Rank2 Feb
  12. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
4 more
  1. 2023Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization5 Oct
  2. 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Survey26 Sep
  3. 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment30 Jun
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 31

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  5. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  7. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  9. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
  10. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
  11. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 656
  12. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 401
19 more
  1. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHFcited by 267
  2. 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 243
  3. 2019Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 224
  4. 2020Learning the Pareto Front with Hypernetworkscited by 125
  5. 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 121
  6. 2013A Theoretical Analysis of NDCG Type Ranking Measurescited by 119
  7. 2023Multitask Prompt Tuning Enables Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 115
  8. 2024Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-Training: A Surveycited by 92
  9. 2020Controllable Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 51
  10. 2019The stochastic multi-gradient algorithm for multi-objective optimization and its application to supervised machine learningcited by 46
  11. 2021Scalable Pareto Front Approximation for Deep Multi-Objective Learningcited by 45
  12. 2024Conditional Language Policy: A General Framework for Steerable Multi-Objective Finetuningcited by 43
  13. 2020PiRank: Scalable Learning To Rank via Differentiable Sortingcited by 27
  14. 2022Improving Pareto Front Learning via Multi-Sample Hypernetworkscited by 16
  15. 2023Controllable Multi-Objective Re-ranking with Policy Hypernetworkscited by 15
  16. 2022Multi-Label Learning to Rank through Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 10
  17. 2024Multi-objective Learning to Rank by Model Distillationcited by 7
  18. 2023Multi-Objective Optimization via Wasserstein-Fisher-Rao Gradient Flowcited by 3
  19. 2022Pareto Optimization or Cascaded Weighted Sum: A Comparison of Conceptscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Self-Improvement Towards Pareto Optimality: Mitigating Preference Conflicts in Multi-Objective Alignment
  2. 2026Data-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization for Target Model Data Selection in LLM Post-Training
  3. 2025Robust Multi-Objective Preference Alignment with Online DPO
  4. 2025Lightweight Robust Direct Preference Optimization
  5. 2025Provably Convergent Primal-Dual DPO for Constrained LLM Alignment
  6. 2024Curry-DPO: Enhancing Alignment using Curriculum Learning & Ranked Preferences
  7. 2026CM-DPO: Constraint-Margin Direct Preference Optimization for LLM Planning
  8. 2024Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness