mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness

arXiv 2408.09834 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2024cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning from human preference is a paradigm used in large-scale language model (LLM) fine-tuning step to better align pretrained LLM to human preference for downstream task. In the past it uses reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) algorithm to optimize the LLM policy to align with these preferences and not to draft too far from the original model. Recently, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has been proposed to solve the alignment problem with a simplified RL-free method. Using preference pairs of chosen and reject data, DPO models the relative log probability as implicit reward function and optimize LLM policy using a simple binary cross entropy objective directly. DPO is quite straight forward and easy to be understood. It perform efficiently and well in most cases. In this article, we analyze the working mechanism of β in DPO, disclose its syntax difference between RL algorithm and DPO, and understand the potential shortage brought by the DPO simplification. With these insights, we propose MinorDPO, which is better aligned to the original RL algorithm, and increase the stability of preference optimization process.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 18 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2024.

Builds on

18 of 19 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  2. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function18 Apr
  3. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
  4. 2024Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive20 Feb
  5. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  6. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
  7. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment1 Dec

Other references · 11

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
  5. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  6. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
  7. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
  8. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 724
  9. 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 454
  10. 2022The CRINGE Loss: Learning what language not to modelcited by 39
  11. 2022A Simple Contrastive Learning Objective for Alleviating Neural Text Degenerationcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Triple Preference Optimization: Achieving Better Alignment using a Single Step Optimization
  2. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset
  3. 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization
  4. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Direct Preference Optimization: Datasets, Theories, Variants, and Applications
  5. 2024AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization
  6. 2025Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference Model
  7. 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study
  8. 2024RS-DPO: A Hybrid Rejection Sampling and Direct Preference Optimization Method for Alignment of Large Language Models