mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning to Play Multi-Follower Bayesian Stackelberg Games

arXiv 2510.01387 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025cs.GT cs.LG econ.THcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In a multi-follower Bayesian Stackelberg game, a leader plays a mixed strategy over L actions to which n≥ 1 followers, each having one of K possible private types, best respond. The leader's optimal strategy depends on the distribution of the followers' private types. We study an online learning version of this problem: a leader interacts for T rounds with n followers with types sampled from an unknown distribution every round. The leader's goal is to minimize regret, defined as the difference between the cumulative utility of the optimal strategy and that of the actually chosen strategies. We design learning algorithms for the leader under different feedback settings. Under type feedback, where the leader observes the followers' types after each round, we design algorithms that achieve Obig(√min(Llog(nKA T), nK ) · T big) regret for independent type distributions and Obig(√min(Llog(nKA T), Kn ) · T big) regret for general type distributions. Interestingly, those bounds do not grow with n at a polynomial rate. Under action feedback, where the leader only observes the followers' actions, we design algorithms with O( min(√ nL KL A2L L T log T, Kn√ T log T ) ) regret. We also provide a lower bound of Omega(√min(L, nK)T), almost matching the type-feedback upper bounds.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

15 of 33 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Strategic Classificationcited by 257
  2. 2015The Sample Complexity of Revenue Maximizationcited by 48
  3. 2022The Sample Complexity of Online Contract Designcited by 35
  4. 2019Generalizing Complex Hypotheses on Product Distributions: Auctions, Prophet Inequalities, and Pandora's Problemcited by 22
  5. 2023Optimal Rates and Efficient Algorithms for Online Bayesian Persuasioncited by 16
  6. 2023Online Learning in Stackelberg Games with an Omniscient Followercited by 15
  7. 2016Algorithmic Persuasion with No Externalitiescited by 9
  8. 2024Algorithmic Contract Theory: A Surveycited by 8
  9. 2024Strategic Classification With Externalitiescited by 7
  10. 2019On the Tractability of Public Persuasion with No Externalitiescited by 6
  11. 2025Nearly-Optimal Bandit Learning in Stackelberg Games with Side Informationcited by 6
  12. 2024The Sample Complexity of Stackelberg Gamescited by 4
3 more
  1. 2024Computational Aspects of Bayesian Persuasion under Approximate Best Responsecited by 3
  2. 2025Regret Minimization for Piecewise Linear Rewards: Contracts, Auctions, and Beyondcited by 3
  3. 2022How Does Independence Help Generalization? Sample Complexity of ERM on Product Distributionscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.