mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LASeR: Learning to Adaptively Select Reward Models with Multi-Armed Bandits

arXiv 2410.01735 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 7

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reward Models (RMs) are crucial to aligning large language models (LLMs), but the degree to which an RM specialized to one task (e.g. writing) generalizes to new tasks (e.g. math) is often not known a priori, often making using only one fixed RM to train LLMs suboptimal. However, optimizing LLMs with multiple RMs simultaneously can incur a prohibitively high computational cost and lead to conflicting signals from different RMs that may degrade performance. To address these challenges, we introduce LASeR (Learning to Adaptively Select Rewards), which frames reward model selection as a multi-armed bandit problem, efficiently and iteratively training LLMs using multiple RMs by selecting the most well-suited RM for each instance. On commonsense and math reasoning tasks, we show that LASeR boosts iterative LLM training, improving the absolute average accuracy of Llama-3-8B over three datasets by 2.67% over an ensemble of RM scores while also showing superior efficiency (e.g., a 2x speedup). Moreover, on WildChat (open-ended instruction-following tasks), LASeR leads to a 72.69% AlpacaEval win rate over the RM score ensemble baseline. Extending to long-context generation, LASeR improves by 2.96 F1 points (avg.) on single-document QA tasks and 2.97 F1 points on few-shot learning over the RM score ensemble baseline with best-of-n sampling.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 69 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.

Builds on

69 of 88 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimization30 Apr

Other references · 68

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  7. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  8. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  9. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  10. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  11. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  12. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
38 more
  1. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  2. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  3. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,378
  4. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  5. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
  6. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
  7. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
  8. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  9. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  10. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
  11. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
  12. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
  13. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
  14. 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
  15. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
  16. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
  17. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
  18. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  19. 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 486
  20. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 480
  21. 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 404
  22. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 399
  23. 2024LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoderscited by 396
  24. 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 386
  25. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 369
  26. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 346
  27. 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 325
  28. 2023Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 295
  29. 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 271
  30. 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedbackcited by 257
  31. 2017Automated Curriculum Learning for Neural Networkscited by 251
  32. 2023Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate Overoptimizationcited by 225
  33. 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hackingcited by 195
  34. 2022ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoningcited by 175
  35. 2024Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modelingcited by 170
  36. 2024WARM: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Reward Modelscited by 145
  37. 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewardscited by 145
  38. 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithmscited by 139

50 most cited of 68 All 68 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Sailing by the Stars: A Survey on Reward Models and Learning Strategies for Learning from Rewards
  2. 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning with Reward Models: An Analytical Survey
  3. 2026Likelihood-Based Reward Designs for General LLM Reasoning
  4. 2025Beyond Monolithic Rewards: A Hybrid and Multi-Aspect Reward Optimization for MLLM Alignment
  5. 2025Distill Not Only Data but Also Rewards: Can Smaller Language Models Surpass Larger Ones?
  6. 2026PARM: Pipeline-Adapted Reward Model
  7. 2025RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Models
  8. 2025Hybrid Reinforcement: When Reward Is Sparse, It's Better to Be Dense