LASeR: Learning to Adaptively Select Reward Models with Multi-Armed Bandits
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reward Models (RMs) are crucial to aligning large language models (LLMs), but the degree to which an RM specialized to one task (e.g. writing) generalizes to new tasks (e.g. math) is often not known a priori, often making using only one fixed RM to train LLMs suboptimal. However, optimizing LLMs with multiple RMs simultaneously can incur a prohibitively high computational cost and lead to conflicting signals from different RMs that may degrade performance. To address these challenges, we introduce LASeR (Learning to Adaptively Select Rewards), which frames reward model selection as a multi-armed bandit problem, efficiently and iteratively training LLMs using multiple RMs by selecting the most well-suited RM for each instance. On commonsense and math reasoning tasks, we show that LASeR boosts iterative LLM training, improving the absolute average accuracy of Llama-3-8B over three datasets by 2.67% over an ensemble of RM scores while also showing superior efficiency (e.g., a 2x speedup). Moreover, on WildChat (open-ended instruction-following tasks), LASeR leads to a 72.69% AlpacaEval win rate over the RM score ensemble baseline. Extending to long-context generation, LASeR improves by 2.96 F1 points (avg.) on single-document QA tasks and 2.97 F1 points on few-shot learning over the RM score ensemble baseline with best-of-n sampling.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 69 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.
Builds on
69 of 88 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 68
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
38 more
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,378
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
- 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
- 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
- 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
- 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 486
- 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 480
- 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 404
- 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 399
- 2024LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoderscited by 396
- 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 386
- 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 369
- 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 346
- 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 325
- 2023Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 295
- 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 271
- 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedbackcited by 257
- 2017Automated Curriculum Learning for Neural Networkscited by 251
- 2023Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate Overoptimizationcited by 225
- 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hackingcited by 195
- 2022ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoningcited by 175
- 2024Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modelingcited by 170
- 2024WARM: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Reward Modelscited by 145
- 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewardscited by 145
- 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithmscited by 139
50 most cited of 68 All 68 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024Scaling of Search and Learning: A Roadmap to Reproduce o1 from Reinforcement Learning Perspectivecited by 49
- 2025Learning to Reason for Long-Form Story Generationcited by 34
- 2024Bootstrapping Language-Guided Navigation Learning with Self-Refining Data Flywheelcited by 18
- 2025Reward Model Routing in Alignmentcited by 3
- 2026Quark Medical Alignment: A Holistic Multi-Dimensional Alignment and Collaborative Optimization Paradigmcited by 2
- 2025Policy-Driven Transfer Learning in Resource-Limited Animal Monitoringcited by 1
- 2026CUPID in the Model Zoo: Online Matchmaking for Selecting Your Dream LLMcited by 0
- 2026CUPID in the Model Zoo: Online Matchmaking for Selecting Your Dream LLM30 May 2026
- 2026Quark Medical Alignment: A Holistic Multi-Dimensional Alignment and Collaborative Optimization Paradigm12 Feb 2026
- 2025Reward Model Routing in Alignment3 Oct 2025
- 2025Policy-Driven Transfer Learning in Resource-Limited Animal Monitoring13 Sep 2025
- 2025Learning to Reason for Long-Form Story Generation28 Mar 2025
- 2024Scaling of Search and Learning: A Roadmap to Reproduce o1 from Reinforcement Learning Perspective18 Dec 2024
- 2024Bootstrapping Language-Guided Navigation Learning with Self-Refining Data Flywheel11 Dec 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Sailing by the Stars: A Survey on Reward Models and Learning Strategies for Learning from Rewards
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning with Reward Models: An Analytical Survey
- 2026Likelihood-Based Reward Designs for General LLM Reasoning
- 2025Beyond Monolithic Rewards: A Hybrid and Multi-Aspect Reward Optimization for MLLM Alignment
- 2025Distill Not Only Data but Also Rewards: Can Smaller Language Models Surpass Larger Ones?
- 2026PARM: Pipeline-Adapted Reward Model
- 2025RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Models
- 2025Hybrid Reinforcement: When Reward Is Sparse, It's Better to Be Dense