mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Distill Not Only Data but Also Rewards: Can Smaller Language Models Surpass Larger Ones?

arXiv 2502.19557 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 12

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Distilling large language models (LLMs) typically involves transferring the teacher model's responses through supervised fine-tuning (SFT). However, this approach neglects the potential to distill both data (output content) and reward signals (quality evaluations). Extracting reliable reward signals directly from teacher models is challenging, as LLMs are optimized for generation rather than evaluation, often resulting in biased or inconsistent assessments. To address this limitation, we propose a novel distillation pipeline that transfers both responses and rewards. Our method generates pseudo-rewards through a self-supervised mechanism that leverages the inherent structure of both teacher and student responses, enabling reward learning without explicit external evaluation. The reward model subsequently guides reinforcement learning (RL), allowing iterative refinement of the student model after an SFT warm-up phase. Experiments on GSM8K and MMLU-PRO demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms traditional SFT-based approaches, enabling student models to surpass the performance of their teachers. This work highlights the potential for scalable, efficient distillation through structured self-supervised reward learning, reducing dependence on external reward supervision.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 31 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2025.

Builds on

31 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning10 Oct
  2. 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Search6 Jun
  3. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
  4. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback15 Dec
  5. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul

Other references · 26

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  6. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  7. 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
  8. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  9. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  10. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
  11. 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instructcited by 618
  12. 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 559
14 more
  1. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  2. 2023Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 417
  3. 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 408
  4. 2022Large Language Models Are Reasoning Teacherscited by 318
  5. 2022Teaching Small Language Models to Reasoncited by 279
  6. 2023Specializing Smaller Language Models towards Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 249
  7. 2022Distilling Reasoning Capabilities into Smaller Language Modelscited by 155
  8. 2024GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solverscited by 155
  9. 2023Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation: Small Models Can Also "Think" Step-by-Stepcited by 144
  10. 2024Toward Self-Improvement of LLMs via Imagination, Searching, and Criticizingcited by 123
  11. 2024Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-Training: A Surveycited by 91
  12. 2023Exploiting Asymmetry for Synthetic Training Data Generation: SynthIE and the Case of Information Extractioncited by 89
  13. 2023Tailoring Self-Rationalizers with Multi-Reward Distillationcited by 21
  14. 2023Learning Deductive Reasoning from Synthetic Corpus based on Formal Logiccited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 5.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Sailing by the Stars: A Survey on Reward Models and Learning Strategies for Learning from Rewards
  2. 2026RM-Distiller: Exploiting Generative LLM for Reward Model Distillation
  3. 2026Distill Where You Fail: Recovering Learning Signals of Negative RL-Groups from Adaptive Teacher Guidance
  4. 2025Rethinking Large Language Model Distillation: A Constrained Markov Decision Process Perspective
  5. 2026Beyond GRPO and On-Policy Distillation: An Empirical Sparse-to-Dense Reward Principle for Language-Model Post-Training
  6. 2025On Teacher Hacking in Language Model Distillation
  7. 2025Chasing the Tail: Effective Rubric-based Reward Modeling for Large Language Model Post-Training
  8. 2026Retrospective Distillation Attribution via Normalized Response Similarity