PARM: Pipeline-Adapted Reward Model
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reward models (RMs) are central to aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, powering RLHF and advanced decoding strategies. While most prior work focuses on single-step generation, real-world applications increasingly adopt multi-stage LLM pipelines, where effective reward guidance remains underexplored. We investigate this through code generation for combinatorial optimization, constructing a pipeline that integrates reward models into both formulation and solution stages. We identify a critical challenge: inconsistency between reward model predictions and actual pipeline execution outcomes. To address this, we propose the Pipeline-Adapted Reward Model (PARM), which leverages pipeline-specific data and direct preference optimization to align rewards with downstream feedback. We instantiate PARM as a two-stage pipeline (formulation -> code generation) and evaluate it on four public optimization benchmarks, measuring execution rate and solving accuracy against baselines and sampling methods. A supplementary cross-domain experiment on GSM8K assesses transferability. Results demonstrate that PARM consistently improves pipeline output quality and stability, providing new insights into reward modeling for multi-stage LLM reasoning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 40 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2026.
Builds on
40 of 50 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Dynamic and Generalizable Process Reward Modeling23 Jul
- 2025VersaPRM: Multi-Domain Process Reward Model via Synthetic Reasoning Data10 Feb
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning13 Jan
- 2024Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Reward-guided Tree Search18 Nov
- 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning10 Oct
- 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Search6 Jun
Other references · 34
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
- 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,154
22 more
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 724
- 2022PAL: Program-aided Language Modelscited by 635
- 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 574
- 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuningcited by 236
- 2021Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 213
- 2023Solving Challenging Math Word Problems Using GPT-4 Code Interpreter with Code-based Self-Verificationcited by 166
- 2023NL4Opt Competition: Formulating Optimization Problems Based on Their Natural Language Descriptionscited by 133
- 2018Correcting Length Bias in Neural Machine Translationcited by 119
- 2024Theoretical guarantees on the best-of-n alignment policycited by 116
- 2024OptiMUS: Scalable Optimization Modeling with (MI)LP Solvers and Large Language Modelscited by 105
- 2024LLMOPT: Learning to Define and Solve General Optimization Problems from Scratchcited by 102
- 2022Augmenting Operations Research with Auto-Formulation of Optimization Models from Problem Descriptionscited by 54
- 2022Sub-Task Decomposition Enables Learning in Sequence to Sequence Taskscited by 41
- 2017Limits of End-to-End Learningcited by 35
- 2024Rethinking Reward Model Evaluation: Are We Barking up the Wrong Tree?cited by 29
- 2025OptimAI: Optimization from Natural Language Using LLM-Powered AI Agentscited by 22
- 2013Knowledge Matters: Importance of Prior Information for Optimizationcited by 15
- 2025OR-LLM-Agent: Automating Modeling and Solving of Operations Research Optimization Problems with Reasoning LLMcited by 15
- 2025AlphaOPT: Formulating Optimization Programs with Self-Improving LLM Experience Librarycited by 12
- 2023Assessing SATNet's Ability to Solve the Symbol Grounding Problemcited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning with Reward Models: An Analytical Survey
- 2025Smaller Models, Smarter Rewards: A Two-Sided Approach to Process and Outcome Rewards
- 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoning
- 2025From Mathematical Reasoning to Code: Generalization of Process Reward Models in Test-Time Scaling
- 2025Rethinking Reward Models for Multi-Domain Test-Time Scaling
- 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling
- 2024CodePMP: Scalable Preference Model Pretraining for Large Language Model Reasoning
- 2025ToolRM: Outcome Reward Models for Tool-Calling Large Language Models