Policy Maps: Tools for Guiding the Unbounded Space of LLM Behaviors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI policy sets boundaries on acceptable behavior for AI models, but this is challenging in the context of large language models (LLMs): how do you ensure coverage over a vast behavior space? We introduce policy maps, an approach to AI policy design inspired by the practice of physical mapmaking. Instead of aiming for full coverage, policy maps aid effective navigation through intentional design choices about which aspects to capture and which to abstract away. With Policy Projector, an interactive tool for designing LLM policy maps, an AI practitioner can survey the landscape of model input-output pairs, define custom regions (e.g., "violence"), and navigate these regions with if-then policy rules that can act on LLM outputs (e.g., if output contains "violence" and "graphic details," then rewrite without "graphic details"). Policy Projector supports interactive policy authoring using LLM classification and steering and a map visualization reflecting the AI practitioner's work. In an evaluation with 12 AI safety experts, our system helps policy designers craft policies around problematic model behaviors such as incorrect gender assumptions and handling of immediate physical safety threats.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 116 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2024.
Builds on
63 of 116 references.
References · 63
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
38 more
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 778
- 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 447
- 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 425
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 340
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overviewcited by 327
- 2019Measurement and Fairnesscited by 299
- 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
- 2023Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?cited by 245
- 2024Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?cited by 227
- 2024ReFT: Representation Finetuning for Language Modelscited by 186
- 2022A New Generation of Perspective API: Efficient Multilingual Character-level Transformerscited by 181
- 2024A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignmentcited by 175
- 2022Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddingscited by 155
- 2024Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferencescited by 142
- 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedbackcited by 124
- 2024Collective Constitutional AI: Aligning a Language Model with Public Inputcited by 120
- 2023Evaluating and Mitigating Discrimination in Language Model Decisionscited by 117
- 2024Modular Pluralism: Pluralistic Alignment via Multi-LLM Collaborationcited by 111
- 2023ChainForge: A Visual Toolkit for Prompt Engineering and LLM Hypothesis Testingcited by 88
- 2023Personalisation within bounds: A risk taxonomy and policy framework for the alignment of large language models with personalised feedbackcited by 86
- 2023Supporting Qualitative Analysis with Large Language Models: Combining Codebook with GPT-3 for Deductive Codingcited by 82
- 2024Concept Induction: Analyzing Unstructured Text with High-Level Concepts Using LLooMcited by 77
- 2023EvalLM: Interactive Evaluation of Large Language Model Prompts on User-Defined Criteriacited by 73
- 2023LLM-Assisted Content Analysis: Using Large Language Models to Support Deductive Codingcited by 64
- 2021The Spotlight: A General Method for Discovering Systematic Errors in Deep Learning Modelscited by 63
- 2021Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for Supportcited by 61
- 2021Designing Disaggregated Evaluations of AI Systems: Choices, Considerations, and Tradeoffscited by 48
- 2021Everyday algorithm auditing: Understanding the power of everyday users in surfacing harmful algorithmic behaviorscited by 47
- 2024Steering Without Side Effects: Improving Post-Deployment Control of Language Modelscited by 44
- 2023Specific versus General Principles for Constitutional AIcited by 41
- 2024Inverse Constitutional AI: Compressing Preferences into Principlescited by 39
- 2023Zeno: An Interactive Framework for Behavioral Evaluation of Machine Learningcited by 33
- 2023ConstitutionMaker: Interactively Critiquing Large Language Models by Converting Feedback into Principlescited by 33
- 2024Participation in the age of foundation modelscited by 32
- 2022Understanding Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities for User-Engaged Algorithm Auditing in Industry Practicecited by 30
- 2023WizMap: Scalable Interactive Visualization for Exploring Large Machine Learning Embeddingscited by 28
- 2024Farsight: Fostering Responsible AI Awareness During AI Application Prototypingcited by 28
50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Data-Prompt Co-Evolution: Growing Test Sets to Refine LLM Behaviorcited by 1
- 2026PASTA: A Scalable Framework for Multi-Policy AI Compliance Evaluationcited by 1
- 2025PolicyPad: Collaborative Prototyping of LLM Policiescited by 0
- 2025Agile Deliberation: Concept Deliberation for Subjective Visual Classificationcited by 0
- 2026PersonaTeaming: Supporting Persona-Driven Red-Teaming for Generative AIcited by 0
- 2026PersonaTeaming: Supporting Persona-Driven Red-Teaming for Generative AI7 May 2026
- 2026PASTA: A Scalable Framework for Multi-Policy AI Compliance Evaluation16 Jan 2026
- 2025Agile Deliberation: Concept Deliberation for Subjective Visual Classification11 Dec 2025
- 2025Data-Prompt Co-Evolution: Growing Test Sets to Refine LLM Behavior14 Oct 2025
- 2025PolicyPad: Collaborative Prototyping of LLM Policies24 Sep 2025