mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Data-Prompt Co-Evolution: Growing Test Sets to Refine LLM Behavior

arXiv 2510.12728 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2025cs.HC cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in applications, and people can shape model behavior by editing prompt instructions. Yet encoding subtle, domain-specific policies into prompts is challenging. Although this process often benefits from concrete test cases, test data and prompt instructions are typically developed as separate artifacts, reflecting traditional machine learning practices in which model tuning was slow and test sets were static. We argue that the fast, iterative nature of prompt engineering calls for removing this separation and enabling a new workflow: data-prompt co-evolution, where a living test set and prompt instructions evolve in tandem. We present an interactive system that operationalizes this workflow. It guides application developers to discover edge cases, articulate rationales for desired behavior, and iteratively evaluate revised prompts against a growing test set. A user study shows our workflow helps people refine prompts systematically, better aligning them with their intended policies. This work points toward more robust and responsible LLM applications through human-in-the-loop development.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2025.

Builds on

47 of 69 references.

References · 47

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  5. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  6. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  7. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  8. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
  9. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  10. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  11. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
  12. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
35 more
  1. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 372
  2. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  3. 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
  4. 2024Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferencescited by 144
  5. 2023Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model Trainingcited by 122
  6. 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116
  7. 2022Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Makingcited by 111
  8. 2023ChainForge: A Visual Toolkit for Prompt Engineering and LLM Hypothesis Testingcited by 88
  9. 2024Red-Teaming for Generative AI: Silver Bullet or Security Theater?cited by 83
  10. 2023UPRISE: Universal Prompt Retrieval for Improving Zero-Shot Evaluationcited by 75
  11. 2023EvalLM: Interactive Evaluation of Large Language Model Prompts on User-Defined Criteriacited by 74
  12. 2022Interactive and Visual Prompt Engineering for Ad-hoc Task Adaptation with Large Language Modelscited by 70
  13. 2022"Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interactioncited by 63
  14. 2017Machine Teaching: A New Paradigm for Building Machine Learning Systemscited by 41
  15. 2023Ignore, Trust, or Negotiate: Understanding Clinician Acceptance of AI-Based Treatment Recommendations in Health Carecited by 37
  16. 2023Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behaviorcited by 36
  17. 2023Zeno: An Interactive Framework for Behavioral Evaluation of Machine Learningcited by 33
  18. 2023ConstitutionMaker: Interactively Critiquing Large Language Models by Converting Feedback into Principlescited by 33
  19. 2024Farsight: Fostering Responsible AI Awareness During AI Application Prototypingcited by 28
  20. 2024What Should We Engineer in Prompts? Training Humans in Requirement-Driven LLM Usecited by 24
  21. 2021Fits and Starts: Enterprise Use of AutoML and the Role of Humans in the Loopcited by 21
  22. 2024Real Risks of Fake Data: Synthetic Data, Diversity-Washing and Consent Circumventioncited by 21
  23. 2023ScatterShot: Interactive In-context Example Curation for Text Transformationcited by 20
  24. 2024Adversarial Nibbler: An Open Red-Teaming Method for Identifying Diverse Harms in Text-to-Image Generationcited by 20
  25. 2021Towards A Process Model for Co-Creating AI Experiencescited by 18
  26. 2024Prototyping with Prompts: Emerging Approaches and Challenges in Generative AI Design for Collaborative Software Teamscited by 16
  27. 2025Prompting in the Dark: Assessing Human Performance in Prompt Engineering for Data Labeling When Gold Labels Are Absentcited by 15
  28. 2024AMPO: Automatic Multi-Branched Prompt Optimizationcited by 11
  29. 2024PromptHive: Bringing Subject Matter Experts Back to the Forefront with Collaborative Prompt Engineering for Educational Content Creationcited by 9
  30. 2025SIPDO: Closed-Loop Prompt Optimization via Synthetic Data Feedbackcited by 7
  31. 2024Exploring Empty Spaces: Human-in-the-Loop Data Augmentationcited by 6
  32. 2025Tempo: Helping Data Scientists and Domain Experts Collaboratively Specify Predictive Modeling Taskscited by 6
  33. 2024Policy Maps: Tools for Guiding the Unbounded Space of LLM Behaviorscited by 5
  34. 2024Insights on Disagreement Patterns in Multimodal Safety Perception across Diverse Rater Groupscited by 4
  35. 2025Divisi: Interactive Search and Visualization for Scalable Exploratory Subgroup Analysiscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.