PolicyPad: Collaborative Prototyping of LLM Policies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As LLMs gain adoption in high-stakes domains like mental health, domain experts are increasingly consulted to provide input into policies governing their behavior. From an observation of 19 policymaking workshops with 9 experts over 15 weeks, we identified opportunities to better support rapid experimentation, feedback, and iteration for collaborative policy design processes. We present PolicyPad, an interactive system that facilitates the emerging practice of LLM policy prototyping by drawing from established UX prototyping practices, including heuristic evaluation and storyboarding. Using PolicyPad, policy designers can collaborate on drafting a policy in real time while independently testing policy-informed model behavior with usage scenarios. We evaluate PolicyPad through workshops with 8 groups of 22 domain experts in mental health and law, finding that PolicyPad enhanced collaborative dynamics during policy design, enabled tight feedback loops, and led to novel policy contributions. Overall, our work paves expert-informed paths for advancing AI alignment and safety.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 234 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.
Builds on
59 of 234 references.
References · 59
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 448
- 2024Judging the Judges: Evaluating Alignment and Vulnerabilities in LLMs-as-Judgescited by 205
- 2019Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attackcited by 176
- 2024MediQ: Question-Asking LLMs and a Benchmark for Reliable Interactive Clinical Reasoningcited by 154
- 2024Collective Constitutional AI: Aligning a Language Model with Public Inputcited by 123
- 2023Explore, Establish, Exploit: Red Teaming Language Models from Scratchcited by 114
- 2020Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learningcited by 111
38 more
- 2024Limitations of the LLM-as-a-Judge Approach for Evaluating LLM Outputs in Expert Knowledge Taskscited by 106
- 2025LLM Social Simulations Are a Promising Research Methodcited by 99
- 2023Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safetycited by 98
- 2023ChainForge: A Visual Toolkit for Prompt Engineering and LLM Hypothesis Testingcited by 88
- 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 87
- 2024Red-Teaming for Generative AI: Silver Bullet or Security Theater?cited by 83
- 2023EvalLM: Interactive Evaluation of Large Language Model Prompts on User-Defined Criteriacited by 74
- 2024Roleplay-doh: Enabling Domain-Experts to Create LLM-simulated Patients via Eliciting and Adhering to Principlescited by 73
- 2025Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providerscited by 69
- 2024(A)I Am Not a Lawyer, But...: Engaging Legal Experts towards Responsible LLM Policies for Legal Advicecited by 63
- 2025No Free Labels: Limitations of LLM-as-a-Judge Without Human Groundingcited by 54
- 2017Balanced Policy Evaluation and Learningcited by 52
- 2021Everyday algorithm auditing: Understanding the power of everyday users in surfacing harmful algorithmic behaviorscited by 50
- 2025AutoRedTeamer: Autonomous Red Teaming with Lifelong Attack Integrationcited by 43
- 2024IdeaSynth: Iterative Research Idea Development Through Evolving and Composing Idea Facets with Literature-Grounded Feedbackcited by 42
- 2023Benefits and Harms of Large Language Models in Digital Mental Healthcited by 40
- 2025Neither Valid nor Reliable? Investigating the Use of LLMs as Judgescited by 39
- 2023ConstitutionMaker: Interactively Critiquing Large Language Models by Converting Feedback into Principlescited by 33
- 2024Participation in the age of foundation modelscited by 32
- 2023Understanding Frontline Workers' and Unhoused Individuals' Perspectives on AI Used in Homeless Servicescited by 29
- 2024Farsight: Fostering Responsible AI Awareness During AI Application Prototypingcited by 28
- 2025OpenAI's Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systemscited by 28
- 2023Interactive AI Alignment: Specification, Process, and Evaluation Alignmentcited by 22
- 2024Two Types of AI Existential Risk: Decisive and Accumulativecited by 22
- 2023Designerly Understanding: Information Needs for Model Transparency to Support Design Ideation for AI-Powered User Experiencecited by 18
- 2023Democratic Policy Development using Collective Dialogues and AIcited by 17
- 2020PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online Communitiescited by 15
- 2020Engaging Teachers to Co-Design Integrated AI Curriculum for K-12 Classroomscited by 14
- 2025WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AIcited by 14
- 2023Case Repositories: Towards Case-Based Reasoning for AI Alignmentcited by 11
- 2025"Ownership, Not Just Happy Talk": Co-Designing a Participatory Large Language Model for Journalismcited by 10
- 2024Canvil: Designerly Adaptation for LLM-Powered User Experiencescited by 9
- 2025PersonaTeaming: Exploring How Introducing Personas Can Improve Automated AI Red-Teamingcited by 9
- 2024PolicyCraft: Supporting Collaborative and Participatory Policy Design through Case-Grounded Deliberationcited by 8
- 2024Democratic AI is Possible. The Democracy Levels Framework Shows How It Might Workcited by 8
- 2025Statutory Construction and Interpretation for Artificial Intelligencecited by 8
- 2022Comparing the Perceived Legitimacy of Content Moderation Processes: Contractors, Algorithms, Expert Panels, and Digital Juriescited by 7
- 2024Venire: A Machine Learning-Guided Panel Review System for Community Content Moderationcited by 7
50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.