mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Dark Side of Rich Rewards: Understanding and Mitigating Noise in VLM Rewards

arXiv 2409.15922 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.ROcited by 7

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

Abstract (arXiv)

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used to generate reward signals for training embodied agents to follow instructions, our research reveals that agents guided by VLM rewards often underperform compared to those employing only intrinsic (exploration-driven) rewards, contradicting expectations set by recent work. We hypothesize that false positive rewards -- instances where unintended trajectories are incorrectly rewarded -- are more detrimental than false negatives. Our analysis confirms this hypothesis, revealing that the widely used cosine similarity metric is prone to false positive reward estimates. To address this, we introduce BiMI ({Bi}nary {M}utual {I}nformation), a novel reward function designed to mitigate noise. BiMI significantly enhances learning efficiency across diverse and challenging embodied navigation environments. Our findings offer a nuanced understanding of how different types of reward noise impact agent learning and highlight the importance of addressing multimodal reward signal noise when training embodied agents

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 32 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2024.

Builds on

32 of 64 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024FuRL: Visual-Language Models as Fuzzy Rewards for Reinforcement Learning2 Jun
  2. 2024RL-VLM-F: Reinforcement Learning from Vision Language Foundation Model Feedback6 Feb
  3. 2023Vision-Language Models as a Source of Rewards14 Dec
  4. 2023Vision-Language Models are Zero-Shot Reward Models for Reinforcement Learning19 Oct

Other references · 28

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
  5. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  6. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
  7. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 966
  8. 2021CLIPort: What and Where Pathways for Robotic Manipulationcited by 617
  9. 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 496
  10. 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 457
  11. 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 362
  12. 2023Minigrid & Miniworld: Modular & Customizable Reinforcement Learning Environments for Goal-Oriented Taskscited by 320
16 more
  1. 2018Reinforced Cross-Modal Matching and Self-Supervised Imitation Learning for Vision-Language Navigationcited by 304
  2. 2022X-CLIP: End-to-End Multi-grained Contrastive Learning for Video-Text Retrievalcited by 279
  3. 2016Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levelscited by 270
  4. 2018BabyAI: A Platform to Study the Sample Efficiency of Grounded Language Learningcited by 238
  5. 2021Benchmarking the Spectrum of Agent Capabilitiescited by 193
  6. 2021Pessimistic Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning under Partial Coveragecited by 160
  7. 2019Using Natural Language for Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
  8. 2023Language models are not naysayers: An analysis of language models on negation benchmarkscited by 73
  9. 2020Out of Order: How Important Is The Sequential Order of Words in a Sentence in Natural Language Understanding Tasks?cited by 72
  10. 2021On the Expressivity of Markov Rewardcited by 71
  11. 2021Heuristic-Guided Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
  12. 2022An Analysis of Negation in Natural Language Understanding Corporacited by 39
  13. 2020PixL2R: Guiding Reinforcement Learning Using Natural Language by Mapping Pixels to Rewardscited by 30
  14. 2022The Effect of Modeling Human Rationality Level on Learning Rewards from Multiple Feedback Typescited by 26
  15. 2017Beating Atari with Natural Language Guided Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
  16. 2023DEIR: Efficient and Robust Exploration through Discriminative-Model-Based Episodic Intrinsic Rewardscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Agent-RewardBench: Towards a Unified Benchmark for Reward Modeling across Perception, Planning, and Safety in Real-World Multimodal Agents
  2. 2025Revisiting the Learning Objectives of Vision-Language Reward Models
  3. 2024Code as Reward: Empowering Reinforcement Learning with VLMs
  4. 2026VLM-AR3L: Vision-Language Models for Absolute and Relative Rewards in Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2023Language Reward Modulation for Pretraining Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026Semantic Bandits: In-Context Exploration-Exploitation is Biased by Semantic Priors
  7. 2024Post-hoc Reward Calibration: A Case Study on Length Bias
  8. 2026Enhancing VLM Reward Models Through Structure-Aware Fine-Tuning