Enhancing VLM Reward Models Through Structure-Aware Fine-Tuning
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Designing effective reward functions remains a major bottleneck in Reinforcement Learning (RL). Recent work uses large foundation Vision-Language Models (VLMs) as reward models, computing text-observation similarity to bypass manual reward engineering. Although promising, these rewards are often noisy and unreliable, limiting their direct utility during deployment. We present Structure-Aware Fine-Tuning (SAFT), a simple, self-supervised method that refines these imperfect reward signals online without access to ground-truth supervision. SAFT leverages intrinsic structural priors to regularize the VLM's latent space via LoRA adapters. We rigorously evaluate SAFT across a spectrum of base model capabilities to demonstrate its versatility. Our results show that SAFT consistently denoises the reward landscape, yielding faster policy convergence and substantially improved alignment (EPIC distance) relative to the underlying base model, suggesting that failures can often be attributed to structural brittleness rather than semantic misunderstanding. By replacing extensive human preference annotation with structural inductive biases inherent to the task, SAFT offers a scalable path for stabilizing text-conditioned RL and underscores the broader value of incorporating task structure as a general inductive bias.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 34 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.
Builds on
34 of 41 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Models19 Oct
- 2023Vision-Language Models are Zero-Shot Reward Models for Reinforcement Learning19 Oct
- 2023Text2Reward: Reward Shaping with Language Models for Reinforcement Learning20 Sep
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun
Other references · 30
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 875
- 2020CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 760
- 2021Learning to Walk in Minutes Using Massively Parallel Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 512
- 2020Reinforcement Learning with Augmented Datacited by 468
- 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 415
- 2016Reinforcement Learning with Unsupervised Auxiliary Taskscited by 404
- 2021Mastering Visual Continuous Control: Improved Data-Augmented Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
- 2018Quantifying Generalization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 352
- 2018Regularisation of Neural Networks by Enforcing Lipschitz Continuitycited by 314
18 more
- 2023Orbit: A Unified Simulation Framework for Interactive Robot Learning Environmentscited by 295
- 2019Improving Sample Efficiency in Model-Free Reinforcement Learning from Imagescited by 274
- 2023Reward Design with Language Modelscited by 261
- 2016CAD2RL: Real Single-Image Flight without a Single Real Imagecited by 233
- 2023Vision-Language Models as Success Detectorscited by 142
- 2023RoboCLIP: One Demonstration is Enough to Learn Robot Policiescited by 134
- 2019Network Randomization: A Simple Technique for Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 104
- 2018Lipschitz Continuity in Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 91
- 2022Few-Shot Preference Learning for Human-in-the-Loop RLcited by 87
- 2016Loss is its own Reward: Self-Supervision for Reinforcement Learningcited by 72
- 2022Can Foundation Models Perform Zero-Shot Task Specification For Robot Manipulation?cited by 70
- 2025Meta CLIP 2: A Worldwide Scaling Recipecited by 64
- 2020Quantifying Differences in Reward Functionscited by 63
- 2024Learning Temporal Distances: Contrastive Successor Features Can Provide a Metric Structure for Decision-Makingcited by 56
- 2023Self-Refined Large Language Model as Automated Reward Function Designer for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Roboticscited by 36
- 2025Hybrid Reinforcement: When Reward Is Sparse, It's Better to Be Densecited by 20
- 2024Advances in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning: A Reviewcited by 8
- 2020Reinforcement Learning with Goal-Distance Gradientcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026CoRe: Combined Rewards with Vision-Language Model Feedback for Preference-Aligned Reinforcement Learning
- 2026VLM-AR3L: Vision-Language Models for Absolute and Relative Rewards in Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Rethinking Reinforcement Fine-Tuning in LVLM: Convergence, Reward Decomposition, and Generalization
- 2024RL-VLM-F: Reinforcement Learning from Vision Language Foundation Model Feedback
- 2025Similarity as Reward Alignment: Robust and Versatile Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Vision-R1: Evolving Human-Free Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models via Vision-Guided Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Code as Reward: Empowering Reinforcement Learning with VLMs
- 2025Enhancing Rating-Based Reinforcement Learning to Effectively Leverage Feedback from Large Vision-Language Models